AndersonH. R. (1942). Teaching critical thinking in the social studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
2.
BeanR.ZigmondM.RogersM.HartmanD., & GozdikG. (1991, December). Use of textbooks in elementary and middle school social studies classrooms. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
3.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G., & GromollE. W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts: Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99–158.
4.
BransfordJ. D., & SteinB. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York: Freeman.
5.
BrophyJ. (1992). The de facto national curriculum in U.S. elementary social studies: Critique of a representative example. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 401–447.
6.
CarnineD.MillerS.BeanR., & ZigmondN. (1994). Social studies: Educational tools for diverse learners. School Psychology Review, 23, 428–441.
7.
CarverS. M. (1995). Cognitive apprenticeships: Putting theory into practice on a large scale. In HedleyC. N.AntonacciP., & RabinowitzM. (Eds.), Thinking and literacy: The mind at work (pp. 203–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CarverS. M.LehrerR.ConnellT., & EricksonJ. (1992). Learning by hypermedia design: Issues of assessment and implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 385–404.
9.
CornblethC. (1985). Critical thinking and cognitive process. In StanleyW. B. (Ed.), Review of research in social education 1976–1983. Boulder, CO: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies Education. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 255 469].
10.
DonahoeK., & ZigmondN. (1990). High school grades of urban LD students and low-achieving peers. Exceptionality, 1(1), 17–27.
11.
EcclesJ. S., & MidgleyC. (1989). Stage-environment fit: Developmentally-appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In AmesC. & AmesR. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education. Vol. 3. Goals and cognitions (pp. 139–186). New York: Academic Press.
12.
FerrettiR. P., & OkoloC. M. (1996). Authenticity in learning: Multimedia design projects in the social studies for students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 450–460.
13.
GardnerH. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
14.
HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (1996). Constructivism and students with special needs: Issues in the classroom. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(3), 134–137.
15.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–70.
16.
LehrerR. (1993). Authors of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In LajoieS. & DerryS. (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197–227). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
LehrerR.EricksonJ., & ConnellT. (1994). Learning by designing hypermedia documents. Computers in the Schools, 10 (1 & 2), 227–254.
18.
MayerR. E., & SimsV. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 389–401.
19.
OkoloC. M., & FerrettiR. P. (1996). The impact of multimedia design projects on the knowledge, attitudes, and collaboration of students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 7, 223–252.
20.
PattonJ.PollowayE., & CroninM. (1987). Social studies instruction for handicapped students: A review of current practices. The Social Studies, 78, 131–135.
21.
SadoskiM.PaivioA., & GoetzE. T. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 463–484.
22.
SimonH. A. (1980). Problem solving and education. In TumaD.T. & ReifR. (Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.