EricksonR.ThurlowM. L., & YsseldykeJ. (1996). Neglected numerators, drifting denominators, and fractured fractions: Determining participation rates for students with disabilities in statewide assessment programs (Synthesis Report 23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 404 801].
2.
McGrewK.ThurlowM. L., & SpiegelA. (1993). An investigation of the exclusion of students with disabilities in national data collection programs. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 339–356.
3.
SalviaJ., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1998). Assessment. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
4.
ThurlowM. L.ElliottJ. L., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1998). Testing students with disabilities Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
ThurlowM. L.SeyforthA.ScottD., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1997). State assessment policies on participation and accommodations for students with disabilities: 1997 update. (Synthesis Report 29). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
6.
ThurlowM. L.YsseldykeJ. E.GutmanS., & GeenanK. (1998). Inclusion of students with disabilities in state standards documents. (Technical Report 19). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
7.
VanderwoodM.McGrewK., & YsseldykeJ. E. (1998). Why we can't say much about the status of students with disabilities in education reform. Exceptional Children, 64(3), 359–370.
8.
YsseldykeJ. E.KrentzJ.ElliottJ. L.ThurlowM. L.EricksonR., & MooreM. (1998). A comprehensive framework for educational accountability for all students. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
9.
YsseldykeJ. E., & OlsenK. (1997). Putting alternate assessments into practice: What to measure and possible sources of data. (Synthesis Report 28). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
