AngeloD. H.KokoskaS. M., & JonesS. D. (1996). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 12, 13–20.
2.
BataviaA. I., & HammerG. (1989). Consumer criteria for evaluating assistive devices: Implications for technology transfer. In PresperinJ. J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America (pp. 194–195). Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
3.
CO-NET (Cooperative Assistive Technology Data Base Dissemination Network). (1996). Hyper-ABLEDATA Database. CO-NET CD ROM version (8th ed). Madison, WI: Trace Research and Development Center.
4.
HansonM. J.LynchE. W., & WaymanK. (1990). Honoring the cultural diversity of families when gathering data. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 10, 112–131.
5.
HetzroniO. E., & HarrisO. L. (1996). Cultural aspects in the development of AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 12, 52–58.
6.
MillerS. P., & HudsonP. (1994). Using structured parent groups to provide parental support. Intervention in School and Clinic. 29(3), 151–155.
7.
ParetteH. P. (1995, November). Culturally sensitive family-focused assistive technology assessment strategies. Paper presented at the 11th Annual International Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs. Orlando, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 387 996).
8.
ParetteH. P. (in press). Effective and promising assistive technology practices for students with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. In HiltonA. & RinglabenR. (Eds.). Effective and promising practices in developmental disabilitiesAustin, TX: PRO-ED.
9.
ParetteH. P. & VanBiervlielA. (1995). Culture, families, and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) impact: A multimedia instructional program for related services personnel and family members. Cram funded by the U.S. Department of Education. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Office of Special Education Programs Special Projects (No. H029K50072).
10.
SotoG.HuerM. B., & TaylorO. (in press). Multicultural issues in augmentative and alternative communication. In LloydL. L.FullerD. H., & ArvidsonH. H. (Eds.). Augmentative and alternative communication. Boston: Allyn A Bacon.
11.
TrivelliL. U. (1994) The impact of human and multicultural diversity on assistive technology outreach and services, NARIC Quarterly4(3), 1. 6–8.
12.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzincB., & ThurlowM. L. (1992). Critical issues in special education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.