ArchambaultF. X. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 16(2), 103–119.
2.
BloomB. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballentine.
3.
BurnsJ. (1994). Creating new paradigms for a school inclusion model for the gifted. Unpublished manuscript. Hammond, LA: Southeastern Louisiana University.
4.
CallahanC. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In PassowA. H. (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development. Seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Pan 1 (pp. 401–423). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
CipaniE. (1995). Inclusive education: What do we know and what do we still have to learn?Exceptional Children, 61, 498–500.
6.
CulrossR. R. (1995). Counseling the gifted. In Directions in child and adolescent therapy. (2)1. 1.2–1.10. New York: Haterleigh.
7.
DavisW. E. (1990). Broad perspectives on the regular education initiative: Response to Byrnes. Exceptional Children, 54(4), 349–51.
FoxL. H., & TobinD. (1988). Broadening career horizons for gifted girls. Gifted Child Today. 11(1), 9–13.
10.
JacksonN. E. (1993). Moving into the main stream? Reflections on the study of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(1), 46–50.
11.
MakerC. J. (1995), 'Teaching models in the education of the gifted. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12.
MathewsF. N. (1995). Current issues in gifted and talented education. Louisiana Gifted/Talented Digest. 22(1), 5–6.
13.
McCarthyM. M. (1994). Inclusion and the law: Recent judicial developments. Phi Delta Kappa Research Bulletin. No. 13.
14.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track; How schools structure inequality. New HavenYale University Press.
15.
Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education (1993) National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359 743).
16.
PurcellJ. (1994). The status of programs for high ability students. (Collaborative Research Series No. CRS94305). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, The University of Connecticut. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 388 022).
17.
ReisS.RenzulliJ., & WestbergK. (1994). Effects of inclusion on high ability students: Concerns raised by current research. Unpublished manuscript. Storrs, CTUniversity of Connecticut.
18.
RenzulliJ., & ReisS. (1991). The reform movement and the quiet crisis in education. Gifted Child Quarterly. 35(1), 26–35.
19.
SkrticT. M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61(2), 148–206.
20.
SlavinR. E. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted: Point-counterpoint—cooperative learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(3), 3–8, 29–30.
21.
StanleyJ. C. & BenbowC. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In SternbergR. J. & DavidsonJ. E. (Eds), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
WhitmoreJ. R. (1983). Changes in teacher education: The key to survival for gifted education. Roeper Review. 6(1), 8–13.