BeaneA. L. (1979). Career education gamesThe Pointer, 23(3), 33–37.
2.
BeattieJ., & AlgozzineB. (1982). Improving basic academic skills of EMR adolescents. Education and Treatment of the Mentally Retarded. 17(3), 255–258.
3.
BirdE. (1992). Guess my rule. Creative Classrooms, 6(4), 82–84.
4.
BrawnD. (1985). Five tips on using games effectively. The Reading Teacher, 39(4), 819–820.
5.
DelquadriJ. C.GreenwoodC. R.StrellonK., & HallR. V. (1983). The peer tutoring spelling game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education and Treatment of Children. 6(3), 225–239.
6.
DickersonD. P. (1982). A study of the use of games to reinforce sight vocabulary. Reading Teacher. 36, 46–49.
7.
EslerW. K., & SciortinoP. (1991). Methods for teaching: An overview of current practices. Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing Co.
8.
HarrisJ., & AldridgeJ. (1983). 3 for me is belter than 2 for you. Academic Therapy. 18(3), 561–364.
9.
HeitS. B. (1980). Gameboards for everyone. Carthage, IL: Good Apple.
10.
HigsenJ. W. (1981). To Tell the Truth: A classroom gaming procedure. Health Education. 12(1), 32–33.
11.
KleinJ. D., & FreitagE. (1991), Effects of using an instructional game on motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Research. 84(5), 303–308.
12.
MacKayM., & WatsonJ. (1989). Games for promoting communication. British Journal of Special Education, 16(2), 58–61.
13.
McBrideJ. H., & LambC. E. (1991). Using commercial games lo design teacher-made games for the mathematics classroom. Arithmetic Teacher. 38(5), 14–22.
14.
OlsonJ. L., & PlaitJ. M. (1992). Teaching children and adolescents with special needs. New York: Merrill.
15.
PetticanJ. (1978). Mathematical games and puzzles for the handicapped. Mathematics in School7(3), 4–5.
16.
RandelJ. M.MorrisB. A.WelzelC. D., & WhitehillB. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation and Gaining. 23(3), 261–276.
17.
SchoedlerJ. (1981). A comparison of the use of active games-learning with a conventional teaching approach in the development of concepts in geometry and measurement at the second grade level. School Science and Mathematics. 81(5), 365–370.
18.
WoodJ. W. (1993), Mainstreaming: A practical approach for teachers (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill.