Anderson-InmanL. (1981). Transenvironmental programming: Promoting success in the regular classroom by maximizing the effect of resource room instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 4(4), 3–12.
2.
Anderson-InmanL.PaineS. C., & DeutchmanL. (1984). Neatness counts: Effects of direct instruction and self-monitoring on the transfer of neat-paper skills to non-training settings. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 4(2), 137–155.
3.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S., & FernstromP. (1992). Case-by-case reintegration of students with learning disabilities. In SchlossP. (Ed.), Current issues in special education [special issue]. Elementary School Journal, 92, 261–281.
4.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S., & FernstromP. (1993). A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming and curriculum-based measurement. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 149–177.
5.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.FernstromP., & HohnM. (1991). Toward a responsible reintegration of behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 16, 133–147.
6.
HundertJ. (1982). Some considerations of planning the integration of handicapped children into the mainstream. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(2), 73–80.
7.
JenkinsJ. R.BarksdaleA., & ClintonL. (1978). Improving reading comprehension and oral reading: Generalization across behaviors, settings, and time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(10), 5–15.
8.
SalendS. J. (1984). Factors contributing to the development of successful mainstreaming programs. Exceptional Children, 50, 409–416.
9.
ThorpeH. W.ChiangB., & DarchC. B. (1981). Programming generalization when mainstreaming exceptional children. Journal of Special Education Technology, 4(1), 15–23.