Outcomes are for Special Educators Too

Anderson R. J. (1992). Educational reform: Does it all add up? TEACHING Exceptional Children, 24(2), 4.

Cawley J. F. Baker-Kroczynski S. , & Urban A. (1992). Seeking excellence in mathematics education for students with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 24(2), 40–43.

Champlin J. R. (1991). Taking stock and moving on. Journal of the National Center for Outcome Based Education, 1(1), 5–8.

The Council for Exceptional Children. (1992). Statement prepared for testimony before the House Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education. Reston, VA: Author.

DeStefano L. , & Metzer D. (1991). High stakes testing and students with handicaps: An analysis of issues and policies. In Stake R. E. (Ed.), Advances in program evaluation: Vol 1A. Using assessment policy to reform education (pp. 281–302). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Elliott E. J. (1989). Testimony before the Committee on Governmental Affairs. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Governmental Information and Regulation.

Evans K. M. (1992). An outcome-based primer. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research in Educational Improvements.

King J. A. , & Evans K. M. (1991). Can we achieve outcome-based education? Educational Leadership, 49(2), 73–75.

McGrew K. S. Thurlow M. L. Shriner J. G. , & Spiegel A. N. (1992). Inclusion of students with disabilities in national and state data collection programs (Technical Report No. 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Minnesota Department of Education. (1991). Model learner outcomes far mathematics education. St. Paul: Author.

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Education Goals Panel. (1991). The national education goals report: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Rothman R. (March, 1992). Experts urge caution in expanding state-level NAEP. Education Week, 11(25), 18.

Shriner J. G. Bruininks R. H. Deno S. L. McGrew K. S. Thurlow M. L. , & Ysseldyke J. E. (1991). Slate practices in the assessment of outcomes for students with disabilities (Technical Report No. 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Sindelar P. T. Watanabe A. K. McCray A. D. , & Hornsby P. J. (1992). Special educator's role in literacy and educational reform. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 24(3), 38–40.

Spady W. G. (1992). It's time to take a close look at outcome-based education. Communiqué, 20(6), 16–18.

Traverse Bay Arca Intermediate Unit Division of Special Education. (1991). Option Il: Curriculum guide. Secondary graduation requirements. Traverso City, MI: Traverse Bay Area Intermediate School District, Special Education Department.

Tyler R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction: Syllabus for education 360. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wiggins G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703–713.