ArmbrusterB. (1985). Content area textbooks: A research perspective. In OsbornJ.WilsonP. T.AndersonR. C. (Eds.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America (pp. 47–60). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
2.
ArmbrusterB.AndersonT. H. (1985). Producing “considerate” expository text. Or easy reading is damned hard writing. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 247–274.
3.
ArmbrusterB.AndersonT.MeyerJ. (1989). The framing project: A collaboration to improve content area reading using instructional graphics. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Reading Research and Education Center, Champaign, IL.
4.
ArmbrusterB.AndersonT. H.OstertagJ. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.
5.
AusubelD. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive review. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
6.
BerkowitzS. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students' memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(2), 161–178.
7.
CarnineD. W. (1976). Similar sound separation and cumulative introduction in learning letter-sound correspondences. Journal of Education Research, 69, 368–371.
8.
GrossenB.MuthukrishnaN.EwingS.SchmittJ. (1991). The effect of using both graphic text structure instruction and considerate text to improve reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon.
9.
HidiS.BairdW. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465–483.
10.
MarshallN.GlockM. D. (1978–1979). Comprehension of connected discourse: A study into the relationships between the structure of text and information recalled. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 10–56.
11.
McGeeL. M. (1982). Awareness of text structure: Effects on children's recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 581–590.
12.
MeyerB. J. F. (1975). The Organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13.
MeyerB.BrandtD.BluthG. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 72–102.
14.
MeyerB. J. F.RiceG. E. (1984). The structure of text. In PearsonP. D. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 319–351). New York: Longman.
15.
RaphaelT. E.EnglertC. S.KirschnerB. W. (1986). The impact of text structure instruction and social context on students' comprehension and production of expository text. (Research Series No. 177). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
16.
RaphaelT. E.KirschnerB. W. (1985). The effects of instruction in comparison/contrast text structure on sixth-grade students' reading comprehension and writing products. (Research Series No. 161). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
17.
RichgelsD.McGeeL.LomaxR.SheardC. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 177–196.
18.
SinatraR. (1984). Visual/spatial strategies for writing and reading improvement. In WalkerA.BradenR.DunkerL. (Eds.), Enhancing human potential (p. 7). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
19.
SinatraR.Stahl-GemakeJ.BergD. (1984). Improving reading comprehension of disabled readers through semantic mapping. The Reading Teacher, 38, 22–29.
20.
SinatraR.Stahl-GemakeJ.MorganN. W. (1986). Using semantic mapping after reading to organize and write original discourse. Journal of Reading, 30, 4–13.
21.
SlaterW. H.GravesM. F.PicheG. L. (1985). Effects of structural organizers on ninth grade students' comprehension and recall of four patterns of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 189–201.
22.
TaylorB. M.BeachR. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.
23.
WinogradP. N. (1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404–425.