BloomB. S. (1986, February). The hands and feet of genius: Automaticity. Educational Leadership, 70–77.
3.
FerritorD. E.BuckholdtD.HamblinR. C., & SmithL. (1972). The noneffects of contingent reinforcement for attending behavior on work accomplished. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 7–17.
4.
HaughtonE. (1972). Aims: Growing and sharing. In JordanJ. B. & RobbinsL. S. (Eds.), Let's try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 20–39). Arlington, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
5.
KrupskiA. (1979). Are retarded children more distractible? Observational analysis of retarded and nonretarded children's classroom behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 1–10.
6.
KrupskiA. (1985). Variations in attention as a function of classroom task demands in learning handicapped and CA-matched nonhandicapped children. Excptnl. Chldrn., 52, 52–56.
7.
LaBergeD., & SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
8.
LindsleyO. R. (1972). From Skinner to precision teaching: The child knows best. In JordanJ. B. & RobbinsL. S. (Eds.), Let's try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 1–11). Arlington, VA: The Cncl. for Exceptional Children.
9.
WackerD. P.BergW. K., & MooreS. J. (October, 1984). Increasing on-task performance of students with severe handicaps on cooperative games. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 183–190.
10.
Van HoutenR., & ThompsonC. (1976). The effects of explicit timing on math performance. Jrnl. of Appld. Bhvr. Analysis, 9, 227–230.