CarboM.DunnR., & DunnK. (1986). Teaching students to read through their individual learning styles. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Co.
9.
Della ValleJ.DunnK.DunnR.GeisertG.SinatraR., & ZenhausernR. (1986). The effects of matching and mismatching students' mobility preferences on recognition and memory tasks. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 267–272.
10.
DunnK. (1985). Small group techniques for the middle school. Early Years, 15(5), 41–43.
11.
DunnR. (1988). Teaching students through their perceptual strengths or preferences. Journal of Reading, 31, 304–309.
DunnR., & DunnK. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company.
14.
HamiltonS. (1983). Reading styles: An experiment with sixth grade, poor readers. Report prepared for the Norton, Ohio, Public Schools.
15.
HartL. (1983). Programs, patterns, and downshifting in learning to read. The Reading Teacher, 37(1), 5–11.
16.
HodgesH. (1982). Madison prep: Alternatives through learning styles. In KeefeJ. (Ed.), Learning styles and brain behavior (pp. 28–32). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
17.
HodgesH. (1985). An analysis of the relationships among preferences for a formal/informal design, one element of learning style, academic achievement, and attitudes of seventh and eighth grade students in remedial mathematics classes in a New York City alternative junior high school. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, New York.
18.
HodgesH. (1987). 1 know they can learn because I've taught them. Educ. Leadership, 44(6), 3.
19.
KroonD. (1985). An experimental investigation of the effects on academic achievement and the resultant administrative implications of instruction congruent and incongruent with secondary, industrial arts students' learning style perceptual preferences. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, New York.
20.
LaShellL. (1986). An analysis of the effects of reading methods on reading achievement and locus of control when individual reading style is matched for learning disabled students. Doctoral dissertation, Fielding University.
21.
LernerJ. (1971). Children with learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22.
LynchP. (1981). An analysis of the relationships among academic achievement, attendance, and the learning style time preferences of eleventh- and twelfth-grade students identified as initial or chronic truants in a suburban New York school district. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, New York.
23.
PerrinJ. (1984). An experimental investigation of the relationships among the learning style sociological preferences of gifted and nongifted primary children, selected instructional strategies, attitudes, and achievement in problem solving and rate memorization. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, New York.
24.
SudzinaM. (1987). An investigation of the relationship between the reading styles of second graders and their achievement in three different basal reader programs. Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
25.
WedlundG. (Ed.). (1987). Directory of learning/teaching styles practitioners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26.
WheelerR. (1980). An alternative to failure: Teaching reading according to students' perceptual strengths. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 17, 59–63.