BarrishH. H.SaundersM., & WolfM. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects on individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.
2.
BellafioreL., & SalendS. J. (1983). Modifying inappropriate behaviors through a peer confrontation system. Behavioral Disorders, 8, 274–279.
3.
BryanT.WernerM., & PearlR. (1982). Learning disabled students conformity responses to prosocial and antisocial situations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 344–352.
4.
GreshamF. M., & GreshamG. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. Journal of Special Education, 16, 101–110.
5.
HayesL. A. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 628–648.
6.
LitowL., & PumroyD. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341–347.
7.
NelsonC. M. (1981). Classroom management. In KaufmanJ. M. & HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 663–687). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
PattersonG. R. (1965). An application of conditioning techniques to the control of a hyperactive child. In UllmanL. P. & KrasnerL. (Eds.), Case studies in behavior modification (pp. 370–375). New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
9.
SalendS. J., & GordonB. (in press). A group-oriented timeout ribbon procedure. Behavioral Disorders.
10.
SalendS. J., & KovalichB. (1981). A group response-cost system mediated by free tokens: An alternative to token reinforcement in the classroom. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 184–187.
11.
SalendS. J., & LambE. M. (1986). The effectiveness of a group-managed interdependent contingency system. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 268–274.
12.
SalendS. J., & MeddaughD. (1985). Using a peer-mediated extinction procedure to decrease obscene language. The Pointer, 30, 8–11.
