Letting the Data Do the Talking: Selecting the Appropriate Nonverbal Communication System for Severely Handicapped Students

Barlow D. & Hayes S. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 12, 199–210.

Hamre-Nietupski S. Stoll A. Holtz K. Fullerton P. Ryan-Flottum M. , & Brown L. (1977). Curricular strategies for teaching selected nonverbal communication skills to nonverbal and verbal severely handicapped students. In Brown L. Nietupski J. Lyon S. Hamre-Nietupski S. Crowner T. , and Gruenewald L. (Eds.), Curricular strategies for teaching functional object use, nonverbal communication, problem solving, and mealtime skills to severely handicapped students (Vol. 6, Part 1, pp. 94–250). Madison, WI: Madison Metropolitan School District.

Nietupski J. & Hamre-Nietupski S. (1979). Teaching auxiliary communication skills to severely handicapped students. AAESPH Review, 4(2), 107–124.

Reichle J. Williams W. , & Ryan S. (1981). Selecting signs for the formulation of an augmentative communication modality. Journal of the Association for Severely Handicapped, 6(1), 48–56.

Sailor W. Guess D. Goetz L. Schuler A. Utley B. , & Baldwin M. (1980). Language and severely handicapped persons: Deciding what to teach to whom. In Sailor W. Wilcox B. , & Brown L. (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 47–70). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.