AcevesT. C.KennedyM. J. (Eds.) (2024). High-leverage practices for students with disabilities (2nd edition). Council for Exceptional Children and CEEDAR Center.
2.
BruceS. M. (2002). Impact of a communication intervention model on teachers’ practice with children who are congenitally deafblind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(3), 154–168.
3.
BruceS. M.BashinskiS. M. (2017). The trifocus framework and interprofessional collaborative practice in severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0063
4.
BruceS. M.IvyS. E.BrumC. (2024). Severe and multiple disabilities. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.PullenP. C. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (3rd ed., pp. 327–359). Routledge.
5.
BruceS. M.LucknerJ. L.FerrellK. A. (2018). Assessment of students with sensory disabilities: Evidence-based practices. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(2), 79–89. doi.org/10.1177/15345084177083
6.
BruceS. M.NelsonC.PerezA.StutzmanB.BarnhillB. A. (2016). The state of research on communication and literacy in deafblindness. American Annals of the Deaf, 161, 424–443. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26235293
7.
BruceS.SacksS.BrumC. (2016). Assessment of students who have visual impairments and additional disabilities. In SacksS.ZattaM. (Eds.), Keys to educational success: Teaching students with visual impairments and multiple disabilities (pp. 101–147). AFB Press.
8.
BrumC. (2023). Communication and literacy development for adolescents with deafblindness: Teacher beliefs, learning outcomes, and instructional strategies. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 41(3), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196211059748
9.
BrumC.BruceS. M. (2023a). Instructional strategies to support shared reading with students who are deafblind. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 41(3), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221077219
10.
BrumC.BruceS. M. (2023b). Shared reading with students who are deafblind: Instructional materials and learning environments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 117(6), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X2311839
11.
BrumC.BruceS. M. (2024). Comprehension for students who are deafblind: Perspectives from teachers, interveners, and parents. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 45(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740123116921
12.
Da FonteA.BoeschM. C.DoddR. E.BennettB. P.Edwards-BowyerM. E. (2016). The SETT framework: SETTing the classroom for communication success. DADD Online, 3(1), 108–122.
13.
DammeyerJ.Ask LarsenF. (2016). Communication and language profiles of children with congenital deafblindness. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 34(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619616651301
14.
EvmenovaA. (2020). Implementation of assistive technology in inclusive classrooms. In ChambersD. (Ed.), Assistive technology to support inclusive education (pp. 177–193). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620200000014014
15.
FerrellK. A.BruceS.LucknerJ. L. (2014). Evidence-based practices for students with sensory impairments (Document No. IC-4). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
16.
FloydK.GalyonC. L.Floyd-NorrisK. (2020). Overcoming barriers: Use of assistive technology to access curriculum. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 52(6), 436–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599209361
17.
GargiuloR. M.BouckE. C. (2021). Special education in contemporary society: An introduction to exceptionality (7th ed.). Sage.
18.
HartmannE. (2016). Instructional strategies: A universal design for learning approach. In SacksS. Z.ZattaM. C. (Eds.), Keys to educational success: Teaching students with visual impairments and multiple disabilities (pp. 204–226). AFB Press and Perkins School for the Blind.
19.
HerzbergT. S.RosenblumL. P.RobbinsM. E. (2017). Teachers’ experiences with literacy instruction for dual-media students who use print and braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X17111001
20.
JonesB. A.Peterson-AhmadM.FieldsM.WilliamsN. (2021). Training preservice teachers to match assistive technology to student needs. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420918337
21.
LucknerJ. L.BruceS. M.FerrellK. A. (2016). A summary of the communication and literacy evidence-based practices for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, visually impaired, and deafblind. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(4), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740115597507
22.
McCarthyT.AndersonD.EmersonR. W. (2023). Components of valid learning media assessments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 117(6), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X231188700
National Center on Deafblindness. (2020). Appropriate assessment strategies: NCDB practice guide. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
NelsonC.BruceS. M. (2016). Critical issues in the lives of children and youth who are deafblind. American Annals of the Deaf, 161(4), 406–411. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26235291
27.
ParkJ.GrempM.OkM. W. (2024). Effects of assistive technology instruction on pre-service teachers: A systematic review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231210988
28.
Peckham-HardinK. D.HanreddyA.OgletreeB. T. (2018). Preparing teachers to facilitate communication skills in students with severe disabilities (Document No. IC17). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
29.
SanfordL.BurnettR. (2008). Functional vision and learning media assessment kit. American Printing House for the Blind.
30.
SatterfieldB. (2016). History of assistive technology outcomes in education. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, 10(1), 1–18.
31.
ZabalaJ. S. (1995). The SETT framework: Critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions. Region IV Education Service Center.
32.
ZabalaJ. S. (2020). The SETT framework: A model for selection and use of assistive technology tools and more. In ChambersD. (Ed.), Assistive technology to support inclusive education (pp. 17–36). Emerald Publishing Limited.