*Al-RashaidaM.AmayraI.López-PazJ. F.MartinezO.LázaroE.BerrocosoS.GarciaM.PerezM.RodriguezA. A.LunaP. M.Perez-NunezP.CaballeroP. (2022). Studying the effects of mobile devices on young children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic literature review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9(3), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-021-00264-9
2.
*AlquarainiT. A.RaoS. M. (2020). Developing and sustaining readers with intellectual and multiple disabilities: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 66(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2018.1489994
3.
*BakerS. K.ChardD. J.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.ApichatabutraC.DoablerC. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence for self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500303
4.
*BegenyJ. C.LevyR. A.FieldS. A. (2018). Using small-group instruction to improve students’ reading fluency: An evaluation of the existing research. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 34(1), 36–64.
5.
*BelliniS.AkullianJ. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73(3), 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300301
6.
BillingsleyB. S.GriffinC. C.SmithS. J.KammanM.IsraelM. (2009). A review of teacher induction in special education: Research, practice, and technology solutions (NCIPP Doc. No. RS-1). University of Florida, National Center to Inform Policy and Practice in Special Education Professional Development.
7.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0003
8.
*BrockM. E.HuberH. B. (2017). Are peer support arrangements an evidence-based practice? A systematic review. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917708184
9.
*BroshC. R.FisherL. B.WoodC. L.TestD. W. (2018). High-probability request sequence: An evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(3), 276–286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26563468
10.
*BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500305
11.
BurenM. K.JohnsonA. H.MagginD. M.BainsB. K.GalliganM. R. L.CouchL. K. (2021). Research utilization in special education. In CookB. G. (Ed.), The next big thing in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 31, pp. 29–46). Emerald Publishing Limited.
12.
BurnsM. K.YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908315563
13.
*BusaccaM. L.AndersonA.MooreD. W. (2015). Self-management for primary school students demonstrating problem behavior in regular classrooms: Evidence review of single-case design research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 373–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9230-3
14.
*CamargoS. P. H.RispoliM.GanzJ.HongE. R.DavisH.MasonR. (2014). A review of the quality of behaviorally-based intervention research to improve social interaction skills of children with ASD in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 2096–2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2060-7
15.
CarnineD. (1995). Trustworthiness, useability, and accessibility of educational research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02110314
16.
*CarrM. E. (2016). Self-management of challenging behaviours associated with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. Australian Psychologist, 51(4), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12227
17.
*CarrM. E.MooreD. W.AndersonA. (2014). Self-management interventions on students with autism: A meta-analysis of single-subject research. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914532235
18.
*ChangY. C.LockeJ. (2016). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.03.010
19.
CollinsL. W.CookS. C.SweigartC. A.EvanovichL. L. (2018). Using performance feedback to increase special education teachers’ use of effective practices. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 51(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918802774
20.
CollinsL. W.SweigartC. A.LandrumT. J.CookB. G. (2017). Navigating common challenges and pitfalls in the first years of special education: Solutions for success. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49, 213–222. https://doi.org.10.1177/0040059916685057
21.
CookS. C.CollinsL. W.CookL.CookB. G. (2025). A systematic mega-review of targeted evidence-based reviews in special education [Manuscript submitted for publication].
22.
CookS. C.McDuffie-LandrumK. (2020). Integrating effective practices into co-teaching: Increasing outcomes for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(4), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219855739
23.
*CullenJ. M.Alber-MorganS. R. (2015). Technology mediated self-prompting of daily living skills for adolescents and adults with disabilities: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(1), 43–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827500
24.
DanielsonL.RosenquistC. (2014). Introduction to the TEC special issue on data-based individualization. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522965
25.
DenoS. L. (2015). Data-based decision-making. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (pp. 9–28). Springer.
*DunnM. E.ShelnutJ.RyanJ. B.KatsiyannisA. (2017). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions on the academic achievement of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(4), 497–524. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44684181
28.
*EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.GriffithC. E. (2017). A systematic review of precorrection in PK-12 settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(4), 465–495. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44684180
29.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MaloneA. S. (2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(1), 35–43.
30.
GerowS.DavisT.RadhakrishnanS.GregoriE.RiveraG. (2018). Functional communication training: The strength of evidence across disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918793399
31.
*GistC.BullaA. J. (2022). A systematic review of frequency building and precision teaching with school-aged children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09404-3
32.
*HaasA.VannestK.ThompsonJ. L.FullerM. C.WattanawongwanS. (2020). Peer-mediated instruction and academic outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorders: A comparison of quality indicators. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(5), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1859330
33.
HittS. B.KwiatekS.VoggtA.ChangW. H.GaddS.TestD. W. (2022). Are online resources for evidence-based practices useful?The Journal of Special Education, 55(4), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920982958
34.
*HughesE. M.YakubovaG. (2019). Addressing the mathematics gap for students with ASD: An evidence-based systematic review of video-based mathematics interventions. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-019-00160-3
35.
*JimenezB. A.KameiA. (2015). Embedded instruction: An evaluation of evidence to inform inclusive practice. Inclusion, 3(3), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-3.3.132
36.
*JitendraA. K.BurgessC.GajriaM. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700201
37.
*JitendraA. K.NelsonG.PullesS. M.KissA. J.HouseworthJ. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties?Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
38.
*JitendraA. K.Petersen-BrownS.LeinA. E.ZaslofskyA. F.KunkelA. K.JungP. G.EganA. M. (2015). Teaching mathematical word problem solving: The quality of evidence for strategy instruction priming the problem structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487408
39.
KearnsD. M.FeinbergN. J.AndersonL. J. (2021). Implementation of data-based decision-making: Linking research from the special series to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211032403
40.
*KnightV.SartiniE.SpriggsA. D. (2015). Evaluating visual activity schedules as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2201-z
41.
*LafayA.OsanaH. P.ValatM. (2019). Effects of interventions with manipulatives on immediate learning, maintenance, and transfer in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A systematic review. Education Research International, Article 2142948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2142948
42.
LandrumT. J.CollinsL. W. (2018). Sources of evidence-based practices in EBD: Issues and challenges. In LandrumT. J.CookB. G.TankersleyM. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Effective and ineffective practices in special education (pp. 131–144). Emerald Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0735-004x20180000030009
43.
LandrumT. J.TankersleyM.KauffmanJ. M. (2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders?The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 148–156.
44.
LaneK. L.GrahamS.HarrisK. R.WeisenbachJ. L. (2006). Teaching writing strategies to young students struggling with writing and at risk for behavioral disorders: Self-regulated strategy development. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990603900109
45.
*LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.ElamK. L.WoleryM. (2012). Using response-prompting procedures during small-group direct instruction: Outcomes and procedural variations. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(5), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.413
46.
*LosinskiM.Cuenca-CarlinoY.ZablockiM.TeagardenJ. (2014). Examining the efficacy of self-regulated strategy development for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.5
47.
*MagginD. M.BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2013). An application of the What Works Clearinghouse standards for evaluating single-subject research: Synthesis of the self-management literature base. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511435176
48.
*MagginD. M.JohnsonA. H.ChafouleasS. M.RubertoL. M.BerggrenM. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50(5), 625–654.
49.
*MagginD. M.PustejovskyJ. E.JohnsonA. H. (2017). A meta-analysis of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior: An update. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517716900
50.
*MasonR. A.DavisH. S.AyresK. M.DavisJ. L.MasonB. A. (2016). Video self-modeling for individuals with disabilities: A best-evidence, single case meta-analysis. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9484-2
51.
*MasonR. A.DavisH. S.BolesM. B.GoodwynF. (2013). Efficacy of point-of-view video modeling: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 34(6), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513486298
52.
*MitchellB. S.AdamsonR.McKennaJ. W. (2017). Curbing our enthusiasm: An analysis of the check-in/check-out literature using the Council for Exceptional Children’s evidence-based practice standards. Behavior Modification, 41(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516675273
53.
*MorinK. L.GanzJ. B.GregoriE. V.FosterM. J.GerowS. L.Genç-TosunD.HongE. R. (2018). A systematic quality review of high-tech AAC interventions as an evidence-based practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1458900
*NinciJ.RispoliM.BurkeM. D.NeelyL. C. (2018). Embedding interests of individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A quality review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-017-0120-6
56.
*OusleyC. L.RaulstonT. J.GregoriE. V.McNaughtonD.BhanaN.MantzorosT. (2020). A comparison of single-case evaluation tools applied to functional communication training with augmentative and alternative communication supports for students with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 107, Article 103803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103803
57.
*OwinyR. L.SpriggsA. D.SartiniE. C.MillsJ. R. (2018). Evaluating response cards as evidence based. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1344953
58.
*ParkJ.BouckE.DuenasA. (2019). The effect of video modeling and video prompting interventions on individuals with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418780464
59.
*QiC. H.BartonE. E.CollierM.LinY. L. (2018). A systematic review of single-case research studies on using video modeling interventions to improve social communication skills for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357617741282
60.
*QiC. H.BartonE. E.CollierM.LinY. L.MontoyaC. (2018). A systematic review of effects of social stories interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615613516
61.
RogersM.HodgeJ.CountsJ. (2020). Self-regulated strategy development in reading, writing, and mathematics for students with specific learning disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 53(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920946780
*SavageM. N.Taber-DoughtyT. (2017). Self-operated auditory prompting systems for individuals with intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of single-subject research. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 42(3), 249–258.
64.
*SchoenS. A.LaneS. J.MaillouxZ.May-BensonT.ParhamL. D.Smith RoleyS.SchaafR. C. (2019). A systematic review of ayres sensory integration intervention for children with autism. Autism Research, 12(1), 6–19.
65.
*SeokS.DaCostaB.McHenry-PowellM.Heitzman-PowellL. S.OstmeyerK. (2018). A systematic review of evidence-based video modeling for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education Sciences, 8(4), 170.
66.
*ShepleyC.LaneJ. D.AultM. J. (2019). A review and critical examination of the system of least prompts. Remedial and Special Education, 40(5), 313–327.
67.
*SpectorJ. E. (2011). Sight word instruction for students with autism: An evaluation of the evidence base. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1411–1422.
68.
*SpoonerF.KnightV.F.BrowderD. M.SmithB. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511421634
69.
*SpriggsA. D.MimsP. J.van DijkW.KnightV. F. (2017). Examination of the evidence base for using visual activity schedules with students with intellectual disability. The Journal of Special Education, 51(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916658483
70.
*SreckovicM. A.CommonE. A.KnowlesM. M.LaneK. L. (2014). A review of self-regulated strategy development for writing for students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 39(2), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900203
71.
*StenhoffD. M.Lignugaris/KraftB. (2007). A review of the effects of peer tutoring on students with mild disabilities in secondary settings. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707400101
72.
SweigartC. A.CollinsL. W.EvanovichL. L.CookS. C. (2016). An evaluation of the evidence base for performance feedback to improve teacher praise using CEC’s quality indicators. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0019
73.
*Tekin-IftarE.Olcay-GulS.CollinsB. C. (2019). Descriptive analysis and meta-analysis of studies investigating the effectiveness of simultaneous prompting procedure. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918795702
The IRIS Center. (2015b). Intensive intervention (part 2): Collecting and analyzing data for data-based individualization. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/dbi2/
78.
TorresC.FarleyC. A.CookB. G. (2012). A special educator’s guide to successfully implementing evidence-based practices. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204500109
79.
*WolfeK.PyleD.CharltonC. T.SabeyC. V.LundE. M.RossS. W. (2016). A systematic review of the empirical support for check-in check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(2), 74–88https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715595957