Planning Universally Designed Inquiry Science Lessons for Students With Complex Support Needs

Bybee R. W. Taylor J. A. Gardner A. Van P. Powell J. C. Westbrook A. Landes N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. BSCS.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/downloads/#v2-2

CAST. (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Duran L. B. Duran E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. Science Education Review, 3(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-1-12

Dynamic Learning Maps Science Consortium. (2014). Dynamic Learning Maps essential elements for science. University of Kansas, Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation.

Hinkle A. R. Lazarus S. S. Fleming K. Thurlow M. L. (2024). The basics of accommodations and modifications (NCEO Brief No. 33). National Center on Educational Outcomes. https://nceo.umn.edu/docs/OnlinePubs/NCEOBrief33.pdf

Jimenez B. A. Browder D. M. Spooner F. Dibiase W. (2012). Inclusive inquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800303

Kam R. Hoop B. (2013). Facilitating inquiry-based science learning online in a virtual university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 3(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v3i2.100

Knight V. F. Wood L. McKissick B. R. Kuntz E. M. (2020). Teaching science content and practices to students with intellectual disability and autism. Remedial and Special Education, 41(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519843998

Koebley S. Wakeman S. Ruhter L. Pugalee D. Karvonen M. (in press). Making science-inquiry accessible for students with extensive support needs. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 27(1).

Kurth J. A. Ruppar A. L. Toews S. G. McCabe K. M. McQueston J. A. Johnston R. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479

McNeill K. L. Krajcik J. S. (2011). Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence, and reasoning framework for talk and writing. Pearson.

Minner D. D. Levy A. J. Century J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis year 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.

Root J. R. Jimenez B. Saunders A. (2022). Leveraging the UDL framework to plan grade-aligned mathematics in inclusive settings. Inclusive Practices, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2732474521990028

Schmidt J. A. Rosenberg J. M. Beymer P. N. (2018). A person-in-context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21409

Sealy G. A. (2017). How do plants grow? DaWit Publishing.

TeachingWorks. (2023). Eliciting and interpreting. https://library.teachingworks.org/curriculum-resources/materials/science-eliciting-and-interpreting/

van Garderen D. Hanuscin D. Lee E. Kohn P . (2012). QUEST: A collaborative professional development model to meet the needs of diverse learners in K-6 science. Psychology in the Schools, 49(5), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21611