BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500
2.
BrowderD. M.LibertyK.HellerM.D’HuyvettersK. (1986). Self-management to improve teachers’ instructional decisions. Professional School Psychology, 1(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090506
3.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.CourtadeG.PenningtonR. (2020). Monitoring and enhancing student progress: Getting the most out of data. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.CourtadeG. (Eds.), Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 93–113). The Guilford Press.
4.
BurtJ. L.WhitneyT. (2018). From resource room to the real world: Facilitating generalization of intervention outcome. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(6), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777246
5.
Cannella-MaloneH. I.SabielnyL. M.JimenezE. D.MillerM. M. (2013). Pick one!: Conducting preference assessments with students with significant disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(6), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500602
6.
CollinsB. C. (2022). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Brookes.
7.
DogoeM.BandaD. R. (2009). Review of recent research using constant time delay to teach chained tasks to persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(2), 177–186. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24233492
8.
GreenG. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760101600203
9.
HandenB. L.ZaneT. (1987). Delayed prompting: A review of procedural variations and results. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8(2), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(87)90010-2
10.
HaringN. G.LibertyK. A.WhiteO. R. (1980). Rules for data-based strategy decisions in instructional implications: Current research and instructional programs. In SailorW.WilcoxB.BrownL. (Eds.). Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 155–192). Brookes.
11.
HornA. L.GableR. A.BobzienJ. L. (2020). Constant time delay to teach students with intellectual disability. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2019.1680946
12.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
13.
HumeK.SteinbrennerJ. R.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2021). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism: Third generation review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(11), 4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2
14.
KratzerD. A.SpoonerF.TestD. W.KoorlandM. A. (1993). Using constant time delay to teach a requesting skill to students with severe multiple disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 16(3), 235–253. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899315
15.
KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.ToewsS. G.McCabeK. M.McQuestonJ. A.JohnstonR. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479
16.
MillerU. C.TestD. W. (1989). Comparison of constant time delay and most-to-least prompting in teaching laundry skills to students with moderate retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24(4), 363–370. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23878520
17.
RiesenT.PolychronisS.IvyS. (2023). Provide scaffolded support. In PenningtonR.AultM. J.CourtadeG.JamesonJ. M.RupparA. (Eds.), High leverage practices and students with extensive support needs (pp. 185–196). Routledge; Council for Exceptional Children.
18.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D.EnnisR. P. (2019). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on K–12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751054
19.
SchusterJ. W.MorseT.AultM. J.DoyleP. M.CrawfordM. R.WoleryM. (1998). Constant time delay and chained tasks: A review of literature. Education & Treatment of Children, 21(1), 74–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899522
20.
SidmanM.StoddardL. (1967). The effectiveness of facing in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-3
21.
SnellM. E.GastD. L. (1981). Applying time delay procedure to the instruction of the severely handicapped. The Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698100600301
22.
TappM. C.PenningtonR. C.ClausenA. M.CarpenterM. E. (2021). Systematic review of mand training parameters for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in school settings. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 56(4), 437–453.
23.
TaubD. A.McCordJ. A.RyndakD. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn for students with extensive support needs: A context of research-supported practices for all in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917696263
24.
ThompsonJ. R.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC.ShogrenK. A.SeoH.LittleT. D.SchalockR. L.RealonR. E.CopelandS. R.PattonJ. R.PollowayE. A.SheldonD.TanisS.TasseéM. J. (2016). Supports intensity scale–children’s version. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
25.
TouchetteP. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.197
26.
WalkerG. (2008). Constant and progressive time delay procedures for teaching children with autism: A literature review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0390-4
27.
WoleryM.AultM. J.DoyleP. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. Longman.
28.
WoleryM.HolcombeA.CybriwskyC.DoyleP. M.SchusterJ. W.AultM. J.GastD. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13(3), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(92)90028-5