Research supports the benefits of inclusive education for all students, including those with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Additionally, educators are supportive of the idea of including students with IDD in general education classrooms. However, they report many barriers to doing so, including a lack of a systematic process to plan for successful inclusive experiences. In this article, we present a systematic process for identifying and arranging supports for successful inclusive educational experiences for students with IDD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cannella-MaloneH. I.SabielnyL. M.JimenezE. D.MillerM. M. (2013). Pick one! Conducting preference assessments with students with significant disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(6), 16–23.
2.
ChazinK. T.LedfordJ. R. (2016). Preference assessments. Evidence-Based Instructional Practices for Young Children With Autism and Other Disabilities. http://ebip.vkcsites.org/preference-assessments
3.
GeeK.GonzalesM.CooperC. (2020). Outcome of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920943469
4.
HarrisJ.HoferM. (n.d.). Welcome to the learning activity types (LATs) website!William and Mary School of Education. https://activitytypes.wm.edu/
5.
JungL. A.FreyN.FisherD.KroenerJ. (2019). Your students, my students, our students: Rethinking equitable and inclusive classrooms. ASCD.
6.
MansouriM. C.KurthJ. A.TurnerE. L.ZimmermanK. N.FrickT. A. (2022). Comparison of academic and social outcomes of students with extensive support needs across placements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221101792
7.
MonzalveM.HornerR. H. (2021). The impact of the contextual fit enhancement protocol on behavior support plan fidelity and student behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 46(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920953497
8.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.SoeH.ThompsonJ. R.SchalockR. L.HughesC.LittleT. D.PalmerS. B. (2017). Examining the reliability and validity of the Supports Intensity Scale-Children’s Version in children with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615625060
9.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism. FPG Child Development Institute.
10.
ThompsonJ. R.WalkerV. L.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). Expanding inclusive educational opportunities for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities through personalized supports. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 396–411.
11.
ThompsonJ. R.WalkerV. L.SnodgrassM. R.NelsonJ. A.CarpenterM. E.HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A. (2020). Planning supports for students with intellectual disability in general education classrooms. Inclusion, 8(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-8.1.27
12.
ThompsonJ. R.WalkerV. L.WehmeyerM. L.EdyburnD. L.SnodgrassM. R.CarlsonS. R.CarpenterM. E.NelsonJ. A.LyonK. J.DinoaroA. P.ShogreanK. A.PalmerS. B.MichalakN.LaydenS. L.TappM. (2022). Planning for the success of students with IEPs: A support-based approach to inclusive education. W. W. Norton & Company.
13.
ThompsonJ. R.WehmeyerM. L.HughesC.ShogrenK. A.SeoH.LittleT. D.SchalockR. L.RealonR. E.CopelandS. C.PattonJ. R.PollowayE. A.SheldenD.TanisS.TasséM. J. (2016). Support Intensity Scale-Children’s Version. AAIDD.