AgranM.WojcikA.CainI.ThomaC.AcholaE.AustinK. M.NixonC. A.TamuraR. B. (2017). Participation of students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in extracurricular activities: Does inclusion end at 3:00?Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 3–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420371
2.
AmadoA.N. (2013). Friends: Connecting people with disabilities and community members. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, Research and Training Center on Community Living.
3.
BromleyK. W.HiranoK.KittelmanA.MazzottiV. L.McCroskeyC. (2022). Barriers to work-based learning experiences: A mixed methods study of perceptions from the field. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 56(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-211169
4.
BumbleJ. L.CarterE. W.KuntzE. M. (2022). Examining the transition networks of secondary special educators: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Remedial and Special Education, 43(6), 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063485
5.
CarterE. W.SchutzM. A.GajjarS. A.MavesE. A.BumbleJ. L.McMillanE. D. (2021). Using community conversations to inform transition education in rural communities. The Journal of Special Education, 55(3), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920950331
FlanaganM. F.BumbleJ. L. (2022). Mapping Assets for Postschool Success (MAPS): Using digital resource mapping to enhance the transition process. TEACHING Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211068143
8.
FlowersC.TestD. W.Povenmire-KirkT. C.DiegelmannK. M.Bunch-CrumpK. R.Kemp-InmanA.GoodnightC. I. (2018). A demonstration model of interagency collaboration for students with disabilities: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917720764
9.
GarwoodJ. D.PeltierC.CiulloS.WissingerD.McKennaJ. W.GiangrecoM. F.KervickC. (2023). The experiences of students with disabilities actually doing service learning: A systematic review. Journal of Experiential Education, 46(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259221109374
KittelmanA.MazzottiV. L.McIntoshK. (2018). Toward a model for collaborative function-based planning in work-based learning environments. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 49(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180968
12.
KramerJ. M.HelfrichC.LevinM.HwangI.-T.SamuelP. S.CarrellasA.SchwartzA. E.GoevaA.KolaczykE. D. (2018). Initial evaluation of the effects of an environmental-focused problem-solving intervention for transition-age young people with developmental disabilities: Project TEAM. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 60(8), 801-809. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13715
13.
LeigersK.KleinertH. L.CarterE. W. (2017). “I never truly thought about them having friends”: Equipping schools to foster peer relationships. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 36(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517707711
14.
MazzottiV. L.MorningstarM. E.LombardiA.KwiatekS.TaconetA.BuddekeK.MonahanJ.HarrisR. (2022). Policy and practice considerations to support college and career readiness for youth with disabilities: A systematic mixed studies review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221130528
15.
McCormickC. E. B.PeskovaV.MorganA.CarlsonE.MasonR. A. (2022). “Setting them up for success”: Including youth on the Autism Spectrum in 4-H. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 913600. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.913600
16.
PearsonJ. N.Stewart-GinsburgJ. H.HopkinsS. L. (2023). Collaborate with families to support student learning and secure needed services. In PenningtonR. C.AultM. J.CourtadeG. R.JamesonJ. M.RupparA. (Eds.), High leverage practices and students with extensive support needs (pp. 25–38). Routledge.
17.
RouseyJ. G.FredrickD.RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L. (2022). Involving key community partners in the implementation of effective practices. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 54(6), 388-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599221114943
18.
RoweD. A.BlevinsM.KittelmanA.WalkerV. L. (2023). Supporting inclusive practices in the least restrictive environment. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 55(3), 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599231156042
19.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2015). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment in predicting outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515585003
20.
SlocumV.AultM. J. (2022). Using video modeling plus a system of least prompts to teach people with intellectual disability to participate in faith communities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 60(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-60.1.16
21.
Stewart-GinsburgJ. H.BaughanC. C.SmithJ.CollinsB. C. (2020). Sanctuaries, “special needs,” and service: Religious leader perceptions on including children with disability. Journal of Disability & Religion, 24(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2020.1776188
22.
Taylor-WinneyJ.XueC.McNabE.KrahnG. (2019). Inclusion of youths with disabilities in 4-H: A scoping literature review. The Journal of Extension, 57(3), Article 22. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol57/iss3/22
23.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H. (2018). A look at the past, present, and future of rural secondary transition. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(2), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517751607
24.
WalkerV. L.CarpenterM.KittelmanA.RoweD. A. (2023). Supports planning to improve access and participation in general education classrooms for students with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599231167479