BiklenD. (1993). Communication unbound. Teachers College Press.
2.
Fairfield Connecticut Board of Education Office of Civil Rights, Eastern Division. (2018). 72 IDELR 165, 118 LRP23214.
3.
FoxxR. M.MulickJ. A. (2016). Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities. Routledge.
4.
HumeK.SteinbrennerJ. R.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2021). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism: Third generation review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(11), 4013–4032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04844-2
5.
J.L., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lower Merion School District, Defendant. (2019). Civil Action No. 20-1416-KSM.
6.
Kahn v. Upper Grand District School Board. Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. (2019). HRTO 1311. File Number: 2018-35148-I.
7.
KnightV. F.HuberH. B.KuntzE. M.CarterE. W.JuarezA. P. (2019). Instructional practices, priorities, and preparedness for educating students with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34, 3–14.
8.
PenningtonR.AultM. J.CourtadeG.JamesonJ. M.RupparA. (Eds.). (2023). High leverage practices and students with extensive support needs. Taylor & Francis.
9.
PenningtonR. C.CarpenterM. (2019). Teaching written expression to students with autism spectrum disorder and complex communication needs. Topics in Language Disorders, 39(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000181
SchlosserR. W.HemsleyB.ShaneH.ToddJ.LangR.LilienfeldS. O.TrembathD.MostertM.FongS.OdomS. (2019). Rapid prompting method and autism spectrum disorder: Systematic review exposes lack of evidence. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-019-00175-w
12.
ShaneH. C. (1995). Facilitated communication: The clinical and social phenomenon. Singular Publishing.
13.
TraversJ. C. (2017). Evaluating claims to avoid pseudoscientific and unproven practices in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216659466