ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE. B. (2016). Inclusive education’s promises and trajectories: Critical notes about future research on a venerable idea. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.1919
2.
BellamyT.IwaszukW. (2017). Responding to the need for new local special education administrators: A case study. CEEDAR Center.
ColeS. M.MurphyH. R.FrisbyM. B.RobinsonJ. (2022). The relationship between special education placement and high school outcomes. The Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221097945
6.
HornerR. H.KittelmanA. (2021). Advancing the large-scale implementation of applied behavior analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 30, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00049-z
7.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq (2004).
OdomS. L.BuysseV.SoukakouE. (2011). Inclusion of young children with disabilities: A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111430094
VandercookT.BowmanJ.GhereG.MartinC.Leon-GuerreroR.SommernessJ. (2021). Comprehensive inclusive education: General education & the inclusive IEP. University of Minnesota, TIES Center.
16.
VandercookT.KleinertH.JorgensenC.SabiaR.LazarusS. (2018/19). The hope of lessons learned: Supporting the inclusion of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities into general education classrooms. IMPACT, 31(2). https://ici.umn.edu/products/impact/312/Lessons-Learned/#Lessons-Learned
17.
WalkerV. L.ChungY.-C.BonnetL. K. (2018). Function-based intervention in inclusive school settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(4), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717718350
18.
WhiteJ. M.CosierM.TaubD. (2018). How states interpret the LRE clause of IDEA: A policy analysis. University of Minnesota, the TIES Center.