AgrawalJ.MorinL. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12093
2.
AlghamdiA.JitendraA. K.LeinA. E. (2020). Teaching students with mathematic disabilities to solve multiplication and division word problems: The role of schema-based instruction. ZDM Mathematics, 52, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01078-0
BouckE. C.LongH. (2021). Online delivery of a manipulative-based intervention package for finding equivalent fractions. Journal of Behavioral Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09449-y
5.
BouckE. C.LongH.JakubowL. (2021). Teaching struggling students mathematics online via explicit instruction. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980852
6.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.ParkJ. (2018). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39(4), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517721712
7.
BurnsM. K. (2005). Using incremental rehearsal to increase fluency of single-digit multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(3), 237–249.
8.
BurnsM. K.CoddingR. S.BoiceC. H.LukitoG. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 69–83.
9.
CarbonneauK. J.MarleyS. C. (2015). Instructional guidance and realism of manipulatives influence preschool children’s mathematics learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.989306
10.
CarbonneauK. J.WongR. M.BorysenkoN. (2020). The influence of perceptually rich manipulatives and collaboration on mathematic problem-solving and perseverance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101846
11.
CarpenterT. P.HiebertJ.MoserJ. M. (1981). Problem structure and first-grade children’s initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/748656
12.
ChoduraS.KuhnJ.-T.HollingH. (2015). Interventions for children with mathematical difficulties. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000211
13.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
14.
DaroczyG.WolskaM.MeurersW. D.NuerkH.-C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
15.
DexterD. D.HughesC. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871103400104
16.
DoablerC. T.FienH. (2013). Explicit mathematics instruction: What teachers can do for teaching students with mathematics difficulties. Intervention in School Clinic, 48(5), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212473151
17.
DysonN. I.JordanN. C.RodriguesJ.BarbieriC.RinneL. (2020). A fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139
18.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.BurtonM. E. (2016). Teaching problem solving to students receiving tiered interventions using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence and schema-based instruction. Preventing School Failure, 60(4), 345–355. https://doi.org/101080/1045988X.2016.1164117
19.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.SeethalerP. M.CuttingL. E.Mancilla-MartinezJ. (2019). Connections between reading comprehension and word-problem solving via oral language comprehension: Implications for comorbid learning disabilities. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(165), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20288
20.
FuchsL. S.Newman-GoncharR.SchumacherR.DoughertyB.BuckaN.KarpK. S.WoodwardJ.ClarkeB.JordanN. C.GerstenR.JayanthiM.KeatingB.MorganS. (2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in the elementary grades. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/26
21.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.CirinoP. T.SchumacherR. F.MarrinS.HamlettC. L.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.ChangasP. C. (2014). Does calculation or word-problem instruction provide a stronger route to pre-algebraic knowledge?Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036793
22.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.HamlettC. L.CirinoP. T.JordanN. C.SieglerR.GerstenR.ChangasP. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446
23.
GarcíaA. I.JiménezJ. E.HessS. (2006). Solving arithmetic word problems: An analysis of classification as a function of difficulty in children with and without arithmetic LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390030601
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.Byrd-CravenJ. (2008). Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982361
26.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/2
GriffinC. C.GagnonJ. C.JossiM. H.UlrichT. G.MyersJ. A. (2018). Priming mathematics word problem structures in a rural elementary classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518772164
29.
HamdanN.GundersonE. A. (2017). The number line is a critical spatial-numerical representation: Evidence from a fraction intervention. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 587–596. http://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000252
30.
HughesC. A.MorrisJ. R.TherrienW. J.BensonS. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142
31.
HughesE. M.PowellS. R.StevensE. A. (2016). Supporting clear and concise mathematics language: Instead of that, say this. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916654901
32.
HughesE. M.WitzelB. S.RiccominiP. J.FriesK. M.KanyongoG. Y. (2014). A meta-analysis of algebra interventions for learners with disabilities and struggling learners. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 15(1), 36–47.
33.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J.HwangS. Y.MoranoS. (2019). A systematic review of experimental studies targeting fractions for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 34(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12187
34.
IvesB. (2007). Graphic organizers applied to secondary algebra instruction for students with learning disorders. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(2) 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00235.x
35.
JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.StarJ. R.RodriguezM. C. (2016). The effects of schema-based instruction on the proportional thinking of students with mathematics difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(4), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414554228
36.
JitendraA. K.LienA. E.ImS.-h.AlghamdiA. A.HefteS. B.MouanoutouaJ. (2018). Mathematical interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917737467
37.
JitendraA. K.NelsonG.PullesS. M.KissA. J.HouseworthJ. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties?Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
38.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R. (2012). An exploratory study contrasting high- and low-achieving students’ percent word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.003
39.
Justicia-GalianoM. J.Martín-PugaM. E.LinaresR.PelegrinaS. (2017). Math anxiety and math performance in children: The mediating roles of working memory and math self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 573–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12165
40.
KongJ. E.YanC.SercekiA.SwansonH. L. (2021). Word-problem-solving interventions for elementary students with learning disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721994843
41.
LanninJ. K.van GarderenD.KamuruJ. (2020). Building a strong conception of the number line. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(1), 18–24.
42.
LaskiE. V.SieglerR. S. (2007). Is 27 a big number? Correlational and causal connections among numerical categorization, number line estimation, and numerical magnitude comparison. Child Development, 78(6), 1723–1743. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01087.x
43.
LeinA. E.JitendraA. K.HarwellM. R. (2020). Effectiveness of mathematical word problem solving interventions for students with learning disabilities and/or mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1388–1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000453
44.
MillerS. P.HudsonP. J. (2007). Using evidence-based practices to build mathematics competence related to conceptual, procedural, and declarative knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1111.j.1540-5826.2007.00230.x
MontagueM.EndersC.DietzS. (2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711421762
47.
MoranoS.RiccominiP. J.LeeJ. (2019). Accuracy of area model and number line representations of fractions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12197
48.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.MaczugaS. (2015). Which instructional practices most help first-grade students with and without mathematics difficulties?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(2), 184–105. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714536608
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
52.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
53.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards mathematics.
54.
NelsonG.PowellS. R. (2018). Computation error analysis: Students with mathematics difficulty compared to typically achieving students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(3), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/153450841774567
55.
PeltierC.MorinK. L.BouckE. C.LingoM. E.PulosJ. M.SchefflerF. A.SukA.MathewsL. A.SinclairT. E.DeardorffM. E. (2020). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919844516
56.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2017). A meta-analysis of schema instruction on the problem-solving performance of elementary school students. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317720163
57.
PetersenL. A.McNeilN. M. (2013). Effects of perceptually rich manipulatives on preschoolers’ counting performance: Established knowledge counts. Child Development, 84(3), 1020–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12028
58.
Petersen-BrownS.LundbergA. R.RayJ. E.Dela PazI. N.RissC. L.PanahonC. J. (2019). Applying spaced practice in the schools to teach math vocabulary. Psychology in the Schools, 56, 977–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22248
59.
PólyaG. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
60.
PowellS. R.BerryK. A.FallA.-M.RobertsG.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2021). Alternative paths to improved word-problem performance: An advantage for embedding pre-algebraic reasoning instruction within word-problem intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000513
61.
PowellS. R.BosS. ELinX. (2021). The assessment of mathematics vocabulary in the elementary and middle school grades. In Fritz-StratmannA.GürsoyE.HerzogM. (Eds.), Diversity dimensions in mathematics and language learning (pp. 313–330). De Grutyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110661941-016
62.
PowellS. R.DoablerC. T.AkinolaO.TherrienW. J.MaddoxS. A.HessK. E. (2020). A synthesis of elementary mathematics interventions: Comparisons of students with mathematics difficulty with and without comorbid reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419881646
63.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S.CirinoP. T.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.ChangasP. C. (2015). Effects of a multitier support system on calculation, word problem, and pre-algebraic learning among at-risk learners. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563702
64.
PowellS. R.BerryK. A.BenzS. A. (2020). Analyzing the word-problem performance and strategies of students experiencing mathematics difficulty. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100759
65.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S. (2018). Effective word-problem instruction: Using schemas to facilitate mathematical reasoning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777250
66.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M. (2009). Do word-problem features differentially affect problem difficulty as a function of students’ mathematics difficulty with and without reading difficulty?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326211
67.
PowellS. R.SteckerP. M. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify mathematics intervention for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914523735
68.
PowellS. R.MasonE. N.BosS. E.HirtS.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.LembkeE. S. (2021). A systematic review of mathematics interventions for middle-school students experiencing mathematics difficulty. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 36(4) 295–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12263
69.
PriceG. R.MazzoccoM. M. M.AnsariD. (2013). Why mental arithmetic counts: Brain activation during single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(1), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2936-12.2013
70.
Ramos-ChristianV.SchleserR.VarnM. E. (2008). Math fluency: Accuracy versus speed in preoperational and concrete operational first and second grade children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0234-7
71.
RiccominiP. J.SmithG. W.HughesE. M.FriesK. M. (2015). The language of mathematics: The importance of teaching and learning mathematical vocabulary. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 31(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030995
72.
RiccominiP. J.StockerJ. D.Jr.MoranoS. (2017). Implementing an effective mathematics fact fluency practice activity. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(5), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916685053
73.
RileyM. S.GreenoJ. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 49–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0501_2
74.
RootJ. R.BrowderD. M. (2019). Algebraic problem solving for middle school students with autism and intellectual disability. Exceptionality, 27(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1394304
75.
RubensteinR. N.ThompsonD. R. (2002). Understanding and supporting children’s mathematical vocabulary development. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9, 107–112.
76.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
77.
SchneiderM.MerzS.StrickerJ.De SmedtB.TorbeynsJ.VerschaffelL.LuwelK. (2018). Associations of number line estimation with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 89(5), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13068
78.
SchutteG. M.DuhonG. J.SolomonB. G.PoncyB. C.MooreK.StoryB. (2015). A comparative analysis of massed vs. distributed practice on basic math fact fluency growth rates. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.003
79.
ShurrJ. C.JimenezB. A.BouckE. C. (2019). Educating students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders: Book 1 research-based practices and education science. Council for Exceptional Children.
80.
SieglerR. S.CarpenterT.FennellF. S.GearyD.LewisJ. R.OkamotoY.ThompsonL.WrayJ. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade: A practice guide (Report No. NCEE #2010-4039). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/fractions_pg_093010.pdf
81.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
82.
StevensE. A.RodgersM. A.PowellS. R. (2018). Intensive interventions in mathematics for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517731887
83.
StockardJ.WoodT. W.CoughlinS.KhouryC. R. (2018). The effectiveness of direct instruction curricula: A meta-analysis of a half century of research. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919
84.
StockerJ. D.Jr.KubinaR. M.Jr. (2017). Impact of cover, copy, and compare on fluency outcomes for students with disabilities and math deficits: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure, 61(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459888X.2016.1196643
85.
StricklandT. (2017). Using the CRA-I strategy to develop conceptual and procedural knowledge of quadratic expressions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916673353
86.
van GarderenD. (2007). Teaching students with LD to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(6), 540–553.
87.
ZhengX.FlynnL. J.SwansonH. L. (2013). Experimental intervention studies on word problem solving and math disabilities: A selective analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712444277