BaroodyA. J., (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In BaroodyA. J.DowkerA. (Eds.), The Development of Arithmetic Concepts and Skills: Constructing Adaptive Expertise (pp. 1–33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
BryantB. R.BryantD. P.KethleyC.KimS. A.PoolC.You-JinS. (2008). Preventing mathematics difficulties in the primary grades: The critical features of instruction in textbooks as part of the equation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F30035523
3.
BurnsM. K.CoddingR. S.BoiceC. H.LukitoG. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087791
4.
CanobiK. H. (2009). Concept–procedure interactions in children’s addition and subtraction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.008
5.
CarnineD. W.JitendraA.SilbertJ. (1997). A descriptive analysis of mathematics curricular materials from a pedagogical perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 18(2), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F074193259701800201
6.
de BreyC.MusuL.McFarlandJ.Wilkinson-FlickerS.DilibertiM.ZhangA.BranstetterC.WangX. (2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592833.pdf
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.NaoomS. F.WallaceF. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 531-540. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049731509335549
13.
FryeD.BaroodyA. J.BurchinalM.CarverS. M.JordanN. C.McDowellJ. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide (NCEE 2014-4005). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/early_math_pg_111313.pdf
14.
FuchsL. S. (2017). Curriculum-based measurement as the emerging alternative: Three decades later. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12127
15.
FuchsL. S.Newman-GoncharR.SchumacherR.DoughertyB.BuckaN.KarpK. S.WoodwardJ.ClarkeB.JordanN. C.GerstenR.JayanthiM.KeatingB.MorganS. (2021). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Intervention in the elementary grades (WWC 2021006). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/WWC2021006-Math-PG.pdf
16.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/rti_math_pg_042109.pdf
17.
HechtS. A.VagiK. J. (2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 843-859. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0019824
18.
HottB. L.DibbsR.-A.NaizerG.RaymondL.ReidC. C.MartinA. (2019). Practitioner perceptions of algebra strategy and intervention use to support students with mathematics difficulty or disability in rural Texas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F8756870518795494
19.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC.Deatline-BuchmanA.Dippi-HoyC.SczesniakE.SokolN. G.XinY. P. (2005). Adherence to mathematics professional standards and instructional design criteria for problem-solving in mathematics. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001440290507100307
20.
KratochwillT. R.HoagwoodK. E.KazakA. E.WeiszJ. R.HoodK.VargasL. A.BanezG. A. (2012). Practice-based evidence for children and adolescents: Advancing the research agenda in schools. School Psychology Review, 41(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087521
21.
LilienfeldS. O.AmmiratiR.DavidM. (2012). Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.006
22.
LongA. C.SanettiL. M. H.Collier-MeekM. A.GallucciJ.AltschaeflM.KratochwillT. R. (2016). An exploratory investigation of teachers' intervention planning and perceived implementation barriers. Journal of School Psychology, 55, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.12.002
23.
MastropieriM. A.BerkeleyS.McDuffieK. A.GraffH.MarshakL.ConnersN. A.. . . Cuenza-SanchesY. (2009). What is published in the field of special education? An analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 76(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001440290907600105
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822
28.
OdomS. L.HallL. J.SteinbrennerJ. R. (2020). Implementation science research and special education. Exceptional Children, 86(2), 117-119. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0014402919889888
PeltierC.MorinK. L.BouckE. C.LingoM. E.PulosJ. M.SchefflerF. A.SukA.MathewsL. A.SinclairT. E.DeardorffM. E. (2020). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022466919844516
32.
PeltierC.PeltierT. K.HottB. L.HeuerA.WerthenT. (2021). “Trends Come and Go”: Early childhood rural special education teachers’ use of reported practices during mathematics instruction. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 40(4), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F87568705211027981
33.
PeltierC.PeltierT.WerthenT.HeuerA. (2020). “State Standards and IEP Goals. A Lot of TPT Products”: What resources early childhood educators report using to plan mathematics instruction. Learning Disabilities – A Contemporary Journal, 18(2), 153–166. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1281051
34.
Rittle-JohnsonB.KoedingerK. (2009). Iterating between lessons on concepts and procedures can improve mathematics knowledge. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X398106
35.
Rittle-JohnsonB.SchneiderM.StarJ. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
36.
Rittle-JohnsonB.SieglerR. S.AlibaliM. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
37.
SayeskiK. L.PaulsenK. J. (2010). Mathematics reform curricula and special education: Identifying intersections and implications for practice. Intervention in School & Clinic, 46(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1053451210369515
38.
SchmidtW. H.HouangR. T. (2012). Curricular coherence and the common core state standards for mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X12464517
39.
SieglerR.CarpenterT.FennellF.GearyD.LewisJ.OkamotoY.ThompsonL.WrayJ. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade: A practice guide (NCEE #2010-4039). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
40.
SoodS.JitendraA. (2007). A comparative analysis of number sense instruction in first grade traditional and reform-based mathematics textbooks. Journal of Special Education, 41(3), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00224669070410030101
41.
StarJ. R.CarononganP.FoegenA.FurgesonJ.KeatingB.LarsonM. R.LyskawaJ.McCallumW. G.PorathJ.ZbiekR. M. (2015). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students (NCEE 2014-4333). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/WWC_Algebra_PG_Revised_02022018.pdf
42.
TIMSS 2019 U.S. Highlights Web Report (NCES 2021-021). (2019). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/timss/results19/index.asp
43.
VanDerHeydenA. M.BurnsM. K. (2018). Improving decision making in school psychology: Making a difference in the lives of students, not just a prediction about their lives. School Psychology Review, 47(4), 385–395. https://doi-org.ezproxy.neu.edu/10.17105/SPR-2018-0042.V47-4
VillarrealV.CastroM. J.UmañaI.SullivanJ. R. (2017). Characteristics of intervention research in school psychology journals: 2010-2014. Psychology in the Schools, 54(5), 548–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22012
46.
WoodwardJ.BeckmannS.DriscollM.FrankeM.HerzigP.JitendraA.KoedingerK. R.OgbuehiP. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4055). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/MPS_PG_043012.pdf
47.
WuH. H. (2011). Phoenix rising: Bringing the Common Core State Mathematics Standards to life. American Educator, 35(3), 3–13. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ943718