ArcherA. L.GleasonM. M.VachonV. L. (2000). REWARDS®: Reading excellence-word attack and rate development strategies-multi-syllabic word reading strategies. Voyager Sopris.
2.
BoardmanA. G.VaughnS.BuckleyP.ReutebuchC.RobertsG.KlingnerJ. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading for students with learning disabilities in upper elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 409–427.
3.
BruhnA. L.McDanielS. C.RilaA.EstrapalaS. (2018). A step-by-step guide to tier 2 behavioral progress monitoring. Beyond Behavior, 27(1), 15–27.
4.
BruhnA. L.RilaA.MahatmyaD.EstrapalaS.HendrixN. (2020). The effects of data-based, individualized interventions for behavior. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 28(1), 3–16.
5.
ChafouleasS. M. (2011). Direct behavior rating: A review of the issues and research in its development. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 575–591.
6.
CosnerS. (2011). Teacher learning, instructional considerations and principal communication: Lessons from a longitudinal study of collaborative data use by teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(5), 568–589.
7.
DatnowA.ParkV. (2009). School system strategies for supporting data use. Handbook of Data-Based Decision Making in Education, 191–206.
8.
DatnowA.HubbardL. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28.
9.
DatnowA.ParkV.Kennedy-LewisB. (2013). Affordances and constraints in the context of teacher collaboration for the purpose of data use. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311311500
10.
DenoS.MirkinP. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Council for Exceptional Children
11.
EbbelerJ.PoortmanC. L.SchildkampK.PietersJ. M. (2017). The effects of a data use intervention on educators’ satisfaction and data literacy. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(1), 83–105.
12.
Farley-RippleE. N.ButtramJ. L. (2014). Developing collaborative data use through professional learning communities: Early lessons from Delaware. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 41–53.
13.
FildermanM. J.TosteJ. R. (2018). Decisions, decisions, decisions: Using data to make instructional decisions for struggling readers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(3), 130–140.
14.
FildermanM. J.TosteJ. R.DidionL. A.PengP.ClemensN. H. (2018). Data-based decision making in reading interventions: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the effects for struggling readers. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 174–187.
15.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99.
16.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MaloneA. S. (2018). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(4), 194–202.
17.
GeselS. A.LeJeuneL. M.ChowJ. C.SinclairA. C.LemonsC. J. (2021). A meta-analysis of the impact of professional development on teachers’ knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy in data-based decision-making. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(4), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420970196.
18.
HensleyK. K.HuddleS. M. (2021). Know what you need: A special educator’s guide to locating and asking for classroom curricular resources. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 53(3), 226–233.
19.
HooglandI.SchildkampK.Van der KleijF.HeitinkM.KippersW.VeldkampB.DijkstraA. M. (2016). Prerequisites for data-based decision making in the classroom: Research evidence and practical illustrations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 377–386.
20.
JungP. G.McMasterK. L.KunkelA. K.ShinJ.SteckerP. M. (2018). Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(3), 144–155.
21.
KittelmanA.GoodmanS.RoweD. A. (2021). Effective teaming to implement evidence-based practices. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 53(4), 264–267.
22.
LamE. A.KunkelA. K.McKevettN. M.McMasterK. L. (2022). Intensifying instruction to meet students’ early writing needs. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 54(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211005165
23.
MandinachE. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85.
24.
MarshJ. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–48.
25.
McDanielS. C.BruhnA. L.MitchellB. S. (2015). A tier 2 framework for behavior identification and intervention. Beyond Behavior, 24(1), 10–17.
26.
MeansB.ChenE.DeBargerA.PadillaC. (2011). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. U.S. Department of Education.
27.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Data-based individualization: A framework for intensive intervention. Office of Special Education, U.S. Department of Education.
PowellS. R.SteckerP. M. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify mathematics intervention for students with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 31–37.
30.
RobertsG.VaughnS.BeretvasS. N.WongV. (Eds.). (2016). Treatment fidelity in studies of educational intervention. Taylor & Francis.
31.
SayeskiK. L.BatemanD. F.YellM. L. (2019). Re-envisioning teacher preparation in an era of Endrew F.: Instruction over access. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(5), 264–271.
32.
WeingartenZ.Zumeta EdmondsR.ArdenS. (2020). Better together: Using MTSS as a structure for building school–family partnerships. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 53(2), 122–130.
33.
YoungV. M. (2006). Teachers’ use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 521–548.