Teaching Math Online to Secondary Students With Learning Disabilities: Moving Beyond the Pandemic

Agrawal J. Morin L. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.111/ldrp.12093

Basham J. D. Carter R. A. Rice M. F. Ortiz K. (2016). Emerging state policy in online special education. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 29(2), 70–78.

Basham J. D. Gardner J. E. Smith S. J. (2020). Measuring the implementation of UDL in classrooms and schools: Initial field test results. Remedial and Special Education, 41(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520908015

Basham J. D. Stahl W. Ortiz K. R. Rice M. F. Smith S. J. (2015). Equity matters: Digital and online learning for students with disabilities. The Center on Online Learning and Students With Disabilities.

Bouck E. C. Long H. (2021). Online delivery of a manipulative-based intervention package for finding equivalent fractions. Journal of Behavioral Education, [Advanced Online Publication]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09449-y

Carbonneau K. J. Marley S. C. Selig J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Cavanagh M. Mitchelmore M. (2011). Learning to teach secondary mathematics using an online learning system. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(4), 417–435.

Doabler C. T. Fien H. (2013). Explicit mathematics instruction: What teachers can do for teaching students with mathematics difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(5), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212473151

Domina T. Renzulli L. Murray B. Garza A. N. Perez L. (2021). Remote or removed: Predicting successful engagement with online learning during Covid-10. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120988200

Ellis W. E. Dumas T. M. Forbes L. M. (2020). Physically isolated but socially connected: psychological adjustment and stress among adolescents during the initial COVID-19 crisis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 52(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000215

Flanagan S. Morgan J. J. (2021). Ensuring access to online learning for all students through Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 53(6), 459–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211010174

Fredricks J. A. Filsecker M. Lawson M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction 43(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Gersten R. Chard D. J. Jayanthi M. Baker S. Mophy P. Flojo J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431

Grant C. (2020). COVID-19’s impact on students with disabilities in under-resourced school districts. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 48(1), 127–141.

Harris L. Dargusch J. Ames K. Bloomfield C. (2020). Catering for “very different kids”: Distance education teachers’ understandings of and strategies for student engagement. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1735543

Hayward D. V. Mousavi A. Carbonaro M. Montgomery A. P. Dunn W. (2020). Exploring preservice teachers engagement with live models of universal design for learning and blended learning course delivery. Journal of Special Education Technology. [Advance Online Publication]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420973216

Hudson P. Miller S. P. Butler F. (2006). Adapting and merging explicit instruction within reform based mathematics classrooms. American Secondary Education, 35(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212473151

Hughes C. A. Morris J. R. Therrien W. J. Benson S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142

Johnston S. Barbour M. K. (2013). Measuring success: Examining achievement and perceptions of online advanced placement students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.755072

Lieberman M. (2020, November 23). No more snow days, thanks to remote learning? Not everyone agrees. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/no-more-snow-days-thanks-to-remote-learning-not-everyone-agrees/2020/11

Mcelrath K. (2020). Schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2020/08/schooling-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.html

McLeskey J. Barringer M.-D. Billingsley B. Brownell M. Jackson D. Kennedy M. Lewis T. Maheady L. Rodriguez J. Scheeler M. C. Winn J. Ziegler D. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.

Microsoft & New Pedagogies for Deep Learning. (2020). Education reimagined: The future of learning. https://edudownloads.azureedge.net/msdownloads/Microsoft-EducationReimagined-Paper.pdf

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2016). Principles for designing intervention in mathematics. http://www.intensiveintervention.org/sites/default/files/Princip_Effect_Math_508.pdf

Peltier C. Morin K. Bouck E. C. Lingo M. E. Pulos J. M. Scheffler F. A. Suk A. Mathews L. A. Sinclair T. E. Deardroff M. E. (2020). Effects of mathematics manipulatives on student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 43(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919844516

Rao K. Tanners A. (2011). Curb cuts in cyberspace: Universal instructional design for online courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(3), 211-229.

Riccomini P. J. Morano S. Hughes C. A. (2017). Big ideas in special education: Specially designed instruction, high-leverage practices, explicit instruction, and intensive instruction. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917724412

Root J. Jimenez B. Saunders A. (2022). Leveraging the UDL framework to plan grade-aligned mathematics in inclusive settings. Inclusive Practices, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2732474521990028

Satsangi R. Billman R. H. Raines A. R. Macedonia A. M. (2021). Studying the impact of video modeling for algebra instruction for students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 55(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920937467

Satsangi R. Hammer R. Hogan C. D. (2018). Video modeling and explicit instruction: A comparison of strategies for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12189

Stahl S. Rank S. East B. Rice M. Mellard D. (2017). Report on the stakeholder form on elementary and secondary online learning and students with disabilities. Center for Online Learning and Students with Disabilities, University of Kansas.

Vasquez E. III Straub C. (2012). Online instruction for K-12 special education: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 31–39.

Welby K. A. (2021). Remote learning strategies for students with IEPs: An educator’s guidebook. Routledge.