AnnammaS.EppolitoA.KlingnerJ.BoeleA.BoardmanA.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Collaborative strategic reading: Fostering success for all. Voices from the Middle, 19(2), 27–32.
2.
ArcherA. L.GleasonM. M.VachonV. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593592
3.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2010). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.
4.
BaumannJ. F.EdwardsE. C.BolandE. M.OlejnikS.Kame’enuiE. J. (2003). Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students’ ability to derive and infer word meanings. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 447–494.
5.
BhattacharyaA.EhriL. C. (2004). Graphosyllabic analysis helps adolescent struggling readers read and spell words. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(4), 331–348.
6.
BoardmanA. G.VaughnS.BuckleyP.ReutebuchC.RobertsG.KlingnerJ. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading for students with learning disabilities in upper elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82, 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625067
7.
BottgeB. A.CohenA. S.ChoiH. J. (2018). Comparisons of mathematics intervention effects in resource and inclusive classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 197–212.
8.
CameronC. E.GrimmK. J.SteeleJ. S.Castro-SchiloL.GrissmerD. W. (2015). Nonlinear Gompertz curve models of achievement gaps in mathematics and reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000009.supp
9.
CapinP.ChoE.MiciakJ.RobertsG.VaughnS. (2021). Examining the reading and cognitive profiles of students with significant reading comprehension difficulties: A latent class analysis. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 44(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721989973
10.
CapinP.VaughnS. (2017). Improving reading and social studies learning for secondary students with reading disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917691043
11.
CarnineL.CarnineD. (2004). The interaction of reading skills and science content knowledge when teaching struggling secondary students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20(2), 203–218.
12.
Center on Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports. (n.d.). Secondary schools. mtss4success.org/special-topics/secondary-schools
13.
ChoE.TosteJ. R.LeeM.JuU. (2019). Motivational predictors of struggling readers’ reading comprehension: The effects of mindset, achievement goals, and engagement. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1219–1242.
14.
CirinoP. T.RomainM. A.BarthA. E.TolarT. D.FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1059–1086.
15.
ClemensN. H.SimmonsD.SimmonsL. E.WangH.KwokO. M. (2017). The prevalence of reading fluency and vocabulary difficulties among adolescents struggling with reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(8), 785–798.
CromleyJ. G.AzevedoR. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
18.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1980). Data based IEP development: An approach to substantive compliance. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 12(3), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005998001200302
19.
DentonC. A.Al OtaibaS. (2011). Teaching word identification to students with reading difficulties and disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 2011, 254245149.
20.
DuffyH. (2007). Meeting the Needs of Significantly Struggling Learners in High School: A Look at Approaches to Tiered Intervention. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, National High School Center. Retrieved from http://www.betterhighschools.org/pubs/
21.
DuncanL. G.SeymourP. H. (2003). How do children read multisyllabic words? Some preliminary observations. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 101–120.
22.
FildermanM. J.AustinC. R.TosteJ. R. (2019). Data-based decision making for struggling readers in the secondary grades. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(1), 3–12.
23.
Freeman–GreenS.DriverM. K.WangP.KamuruJ.JacksonD. (2021). Culturally sustaining practices in content area instruction for CLD students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(1), 12-25.
24.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BurishP. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 85–91.
25.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203.
26.
GreenleafC.ValenciaS. (2017). Missing in action: Learning from texts in subject-matter classrooms. In HinchmanK.ApplemanD. (Eds.), Adolescent literacies: A handbook of practice-based research (pp. 235–256). Guilford Press.
27.
GuthrieJ.WigfieldA. (2018). Literacy engagement and motivation: Rationale, research, teaching and assessment. In LappD.FisherD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (4th ed., pp. 57–84). Taylor & Francis.
28.
HerreraS.TruckenmillerA. J.FoormanB. R. (2016). Summary of 20 years of research on the effectiveness of adolescent literacy programs and practices (REL 2016–178). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
HwangH.CabellS. Q.JoynerR. E. (2021). Effects of integrated literacy and content-area instruction on vocabulary and comprehension in the elementary years: A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1954005
31.
IaconoT.LandryO.Garcia-MelgarA.SpongJ.HyettN.BagleyK.McKinstryC. (2021). A systematized review of co-teaching efficacy in enhancing inclusive education for students with disability. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1900423
JenkinsJ. R.AntilL. R.WayneS. K.VadasyP. F. (2003). How cooperative learning works for special education and remedial students. Exceptional Children, 69, 279–292.
34.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67–73.
35.
KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KralC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2008-4027. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
36.
KingS. A.LemonsC. J.HillD. R. (2012). Response to intervention in secondary schools: Considerations for administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 96(1), 5–22.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition though Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, 52(7), 738–747.
39.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 69–98.
40.
KosanovichM. L.ReedD. K.MillerD. H. (2010). Bringing literacy strategies into content instruction: Professional learning for secondary-level teachers. Center on Instruction.
41.
LemonsC. J.KearnsD. M.DavidsonK. A. (2014). Data-based individualization in reading: Intensifying interventions for students with significant reading disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522978
42.
McIntoshK.Brigid FlanneryK.SugaiG.BraunD. H.CochraneK. L. (2008). Relationships between academics and problem behavior in the transition from middle school to high school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10(4), 243–255.
43.
MeisingerE. B.SchwanenflugelP. J.BradleyB. A.StahlS. A. (2004). Interaction quality during partner reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(2), 111–140.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). National Assessment of Educational Progress: An overview of NAEP. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
45.
National Center on MTSS (2020, December15). Essential Components of MTSS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention. https://mtss4success.org/essential-components
46.
National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.
47.
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, Human Development (US), National Reading Excellence Initiative, National Institute for Literacy (US), & United States Department of Health. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. National Institutes of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
PrattS.ImbodyS.WolfL.PattersonA. (2017). Co-planning in co-teaching: A practical solution. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216659474
50.
PrewettS.MellardD. F.DeshlerD. D.AllenJ.AlexanderR.SternA. (2012). Response to intervention in middle schools: Practices and outcomes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(3), 136–147.
51.
ReedD. K.WexlerJ.VaughnS. (2012). RTI for reading at the secondary level: Recommended literacy practices and remaining questions. Guilford Press.
52.
SavitzR. S.AllenA. A.BrownC. (2022). Variations in RTI literacy implementation in Grades 6-12: A national study. Literacy Research and Instruction, 61(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.1887416
53.
SavitzR. S.AllingtonR. L.WilkinsJ. (2018). Response to intervention: A summary of the guidance state departments of education provide to schools and school districts. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91(6), 243–249.
54.
ScammaccaN. K.RobertsG.VaughnS.StuebingK. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504995
SinclairA. C.BrayL. E.WeiY.ClancyE. E.WexlerJ.KearnsD. M.LemonsC. J. (2018). Coteaching in content area classrooms: Lessons and guiding questions for administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 102(4), 303–322.
57.
SolisM.VaughnS.SwansonE.McculleyL. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49(5), 498–510.
58.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.FallA. M. (2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563704
59.
SwansonE. A.WexlerJ.VaughnS. (2009). Text reading and students with learning disabilities In HiebertE. H. (Ed.), Reading more, Reading better (pp. 210–230). Guilford Press.
ThomasC. N.AllenA. A.CiulloS.LembkeE. S.BillingsleyG.GoodwinM.JuddL. (2020). Exploring the perceptions of middle school teachers regarding response to intervention for struggling readers. Exceptionality, 1–18.
62.
TosteJ. R.CapinP.VaughnS.RobertsG. J.KearnsD. M. (2017). Multisyllabic word-reading instruction with and without motivational beliefs training for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A pilot investigation. Elementary School Journal, 117(4), 593–615.
63.
TosteJ. R.CapinP.WilliamsK. J.ChoE.VaughnS. (2019). Replication of an experimental study investigating the efficacy of a multisyllabic word reading intervention with and without motivational beliefs training for struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 45–58.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. D.BarthA.RomainM.FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3–21.
67.
VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2012). Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 244–256.
68.
VaughnS.RobertsG.SwansonE. A.WanzekJ.FallA. M.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2015). Improving middle-school students’ knowledge and comprehension in social studies: A replication. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2
69.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN.GatlinB.WalkerM. A.CapinP. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7
70.
WexlerJ.KearnsD. M.LemonsC. J.MitchellM.ClancyE.DavidsonK. A.SinclairA. C.WeiY. (2018). Reading comprehension and co-teaching practices in middle school English language arts classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 384–402.
71.
WexlerJ.MitchellM. A.ClancyE. E.SilvermanR. D. (2017). An investigation of literacy practices in high school science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832
72.
WilliamsK. J.StevensE.VaughnS. (2018). RTI in secondary schools: Current issues and recommendations. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention and multi-tiered systems of support (pp. 338–350). Routledge.