Manipulative-based instructional sequences—including both concrete and virtual manipulative instructional sequences—are evidence-based or research-based mathematical interventions for students with disabilities. However, as options for manipulative-based instructional sequences increase, educators need support in deciding the best approach. In this manuscript, we provide practical tips for educators to make decisions about selecting and implementing manipulative-based instructional sequences for students with disabilities. We present and discuss the following steps educators should take when preparing to use a manipulative-based instructional sequence: (a) determine resources, (b) know the student, (c) identify the targeted mathematics, (d) evaluate time constraints, and (c) decide upon the ultimate goal of learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrawalJ.MorinL. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12093
2.
BouckE. C.BassetteL.ShurrJ.ParkJ.KerrJ.WhorleyA. (2017). Teaching equivalent fractions to secondary students with disabilities via the virtual- representational-abstract instructional sequence. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(4), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417727291
3.
BouckE. C.ChamberlainC.ParkJ. (2017). Concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with subtraction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(3), 317–331.
4.
BouckE. C.MathewsL. A.PeltierC. (2020). Virtual manipulatives: A tool to support access and achievement with middle school students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419882422
5.
BouckE. C.ParkJ. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0003
6.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.SatsangiR.CwiakalaK.LevyK. (2019). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to support acquisition of algebra. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(4), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419833022
7.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.DoughtyT. T.CourtneyW. T. (2014). Virtual and concrete manipulatives: A comparison of approaches for solving mathematics problems for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 44(2014), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1863-2
8.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.ParkJ. (2018). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517721712
9.
BouckE. C.ShurrJ.ParkJ. (2020). Virtual manipulative-based intervention package to teach multiplication and division to secondary students with developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357620943499
10.
CarbonneauK. J.MarleyS. C.SeligJ. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084
11.
CookB. G.SmithG. J.TankersleyM. (2011). Evidence-based practices in education. In HarrisK. R.GrahamS.UrdanT. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 493–528). American Psychological Association.
12.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). Universal Design for Learning: A guide for teachers and education professionals. Pearson.
13.
DoablerC. T.FienH. (2013). Explicit mathematics instruction: What teachers can do for teaching students with mathematics difficulties. Intervention in School Clinic, 48(5), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212473151
14.
FloresM. M. (2009). Teaching subtraction with regrouping to students experiencing difficulty in mathematics. Preventing School Failure, 53, 145–152.
15.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
16.
JitendraA. K.NelsonG.PullesS. M.KissA. J.HouseworthJ. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 83, 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
17.
KellemsR. O.FrandsenK.HansenB.GabrielsenT.ClarkeB.SimonsK.ClementsK. (2016). Teaching multi-step math skills to adults with disabilities via video prompting. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 58, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.08.013
18.
MacciniP.GagnonJ. C. (2000). Best Practices for teaching mathematics to secondary students with special needs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(5), 1–22.
19.
MacciniP.HughesC. A. (2000). Effects of a problem-solving strategy on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 10–21.
20.
ParkJ.BouckE. C.FisherM. (2021). Using the virtual-representational-abstract instructional sequence with overlearning to students with disabilities in mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 54(4), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920912527
21.
ParkJ.BouckE. C.SmithJ. P. (2020). Using the virtual-representational-abstract instructional sequence with fading support to teach subtraction to students with developmental disabilitiesJournal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04225-4
22.
PeltierC.MorinK. L.BouckE. C.LingoM. E.PulosJ. M.SchefflerF. A.SukA.MathewsL. A.SinclairT. E.DeardorffM. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919844516
23.
SatsangiR.BouckE. C.Taber-DoughtyT.BofferdingL.RobertsC. A. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716649754
24.
SatsangiR.MillerB. (2017). The case for adopting virtual manipulatives in mathematics education for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1275505
25.
ShurrJ. C.JimenezB. A.BouckE. C. (2019). Educating students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders: Book 1. Research-based practices and education science. Council for Exceptional Children.
26.
StroizerS.HintonV.FloresM.TerryL. (2015). An investigation of the effects of CRA instruction and students with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 223–236.
27.
UnderhillR. (1977). Teaching elementary school mathematics (2nd ed.). Merrill.
WitzelB. S.MercerC. D.MillerM. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 121–131.
