Integrating Interventions for Elementary Students Experiencing Co-Occurring Academic and Behavior Needs

Abstract

Teachers who work with students with targeted, co-occurring academic and behavior differences require the knowledge, tools, and support for effective interventions across both domains. This article provides a research-informed, three-step process to support teachers in designing and implementing integrated targeted interventions for mathematics and self-monitoring needs in an elementary, co-taught classroom. This strategic approach includes: (a) screening and diagnostic assessment, (b) delivering academic and behavioral strategies and interventions, and (c) monitoring progress to inform instructional decisions. A case example of a second-grade classroom during supplemental small group linear measurement instruction and self-monitoring integrated Tier 2 intervention is provided for context.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Batsche

G. M.

Elliot

Garden

Grimes

Kovaleski

J. F.

Prasse

Tilly

W. D.

III . (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

Berkeley

Bender

W. N.

Gregg Peaster

Saunders

(2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326214

Brown-Chidsey

Bickford

(2016). Practical handbook of multi-tiered systems of support: Building academic and behavioral success in schools. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022219408326214

Bruhn

A. L.

Hirsch

S. E.

Lloyd

J. W.

(2015). Treatment integrity in school-wide programs: A review of the literature (1993–2012). The Journal of Primary Prevention, 36(5), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-015-0400-9

Bruhn

A. L.

McDaniel

S. C.

Rila

Estrapala

(2018). A step-by-step guide to tier 2 behavioral progress monitoring. Beyond Behavior, 27(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618756984

Center on Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports, American Institutes for Research. (2021). Essential components of MTSS. https://mtss4success.org/essential-components

Daniels

Briesch

A. M.

Volpe

R. J.

Owens

J. S.

(2021). Content validation of Direct Behavior Rating Multi-Item Scales for assessing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 29(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426619882345

Fletcher

J. M.

Vaughn

(2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x

Fuchs

L. S.

(2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4

10.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(1986). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long-term and short-term goals. The Journal of Special Education, 20(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698602000108

11.

Goodman

(1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x

12.

Harbour

K. E.

Karp

K. S.

Lingo

A. S.

(2016). Inquiry to action: Diagnosing and addressing students’ relational thinking about the equal sign. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916673310

13.

Hodges

T. E.

Rose

T. D.

Hicks

A. D.

(2012). Interviews as RTI tools. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.19.1.0030

14.

Hustus

C. L.

Owens

J. S.

Volpe

R. J.

Briesch

A. M.

Daniels

(2020). Treatment and sensitivity of Direct Behavior Rating-Multi-Item Scales in the context of a daily report card intervention. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 28(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426618806281

15.

Kamii

(2006). Measurement of length: How can we teach it better? Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(3), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.13.3.0154

16.

Lane

K. L.

Menzies

H. M.

Ennis

R. P.

Bezdek

(2013). School-wide systems to promote positive behaviors and facilitate instruction. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2013.v7n1p6-31

17.

Lane

K. L.

Wehby

J. H.

Little

M. A.

Cooley

(2005). Academic, social, and behavioral profiles of students with emotional and behavioral disorders education in self-contained classrooms and self-contained schools: Part I—Are they more alike than different? Behavioral Disorders, 30(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290503000407

18.

Lee

M. Y.

Francis

D. C.

(2016). 5 ways to improve children’s understanding of length measurement. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(4), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.23.4.0218

19.

Lewis

T. J.

Sugai

(1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v31i6.6767

20.

McDaniel

S. C.

Bruhn

A. L.

Mitchell

(2015). A tier 2 framework for identification and intervention. Beyond Behavior, 24(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/107429561502400103.

21.

McDaniel

S. C.

Houchins

D. E.

Terry

N. P.

(2012). Corrective reading as a supplementary curriculum for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional Behavioral Disorders, 21(4), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611433506

22.

McDaniel

S. C.

Jolivette

Ennis

R. P.

(2013). The effects of self-graphing on oral reading fluency for a student with E/BD within an alternative education school. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, Spring/Summer, 69–82.

23.

McIntosh

Goodman

(2017). Integrated multi-tiered systems of support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Guilford Press.

24.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data explorer, 2017 Mathematics Assessment. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

25.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.

26.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf

27.

National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics ( Kilpatrick

J. Swafford

Findell

, Eds.). National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822

28.

Saeki

Jimerson

S. R.

Earhart

Hart

S. R.

Renshaw

Singh

R. D.

Stewart

(2011). Response to Intervention (RtI) in the social, emotional, and behavioral domains: Current challenges and emerging possibilities. Contemporary School Psychology, 15(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340962

29.

Sugai

Horner

R. H.

(2008). What we know and need to know about preventing problem behavior in schools. Exceptionality, 16(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830801981138

30.

VanDerHeyden

A. M.

Witt

J. C.

(2008). Best practices in can’t do/won’t do assessment. In Thomas

Grimes

(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 195–208). National Association of School Psychologists.

31.

Warmbold-Brann

K. L.

Burns

M. K.

Preast

J. L.

Taylor

C. N.

Aguilar

L. N.

(2017). Meta-analysis of the effects of academic intervention on student behavior outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 32, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000207