Using UDL to Plan a Book Study Lesson for Students With Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms

Abstract

Students with intellectual disabilities are among the least likely students to spend a significant amount of time in general education classrooms. When they are included, they may spend their time on non-academic learning experiences. Universal Design for Learning is a lesson planning framework that can guide teachers in inclusive lesson planning. This article explores the Universal Design for Learning framework and how teachers can incorporate it into the lesson planning process for a book study in high school English Language Arts. This lesson planning process provides genuine learning experiences to students with intellectual disabilities in the general education classrooms. The article offers examples of how to incorporate multiple means of representation, multiple means of engagement, and multiple means of expression and action within the four steps of the lesson planning process: learning goals, instructional methods, instructional materials, and assessment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alquraini

T. A.

Rao

S. M.

(2020). Developing and sustaining readers with intellectual and multiple disabilities: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 66(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2018.1489994

Alsarawi

(2019). A process, framework, and set of tools for facilitating co-planning among co-teachers. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 15(2), 1–23.

Anderson

L. K.

Fitzpatrick

(2018). Using Universal Design for Learning to include students with significant support needs. ACRES.

Biklen

Burke

(2006). Presuming competence. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(2), 166–175.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines Version 2.2 [Graphic organizer]. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/downloads

Colorado Department of Education, Office of Standards and Assessments. (2011). Colorado academic standards: RWC extended evidence outcomes. https://www.cde.state.co.us/sites/default/files/documents/coextendedeo/documents/rwc_with_eeos.pdf

Coyne

Evans

Karger

(2017). Use of a UDL literacy environment by middle school students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.4

Dynamic Learning Maps Consortium. (2013). Dynamic Learning Maps essential elements for English language arts. University of Kansas.

Eccleston

S. T.

(2010). Successful collaboration: Four essential traits of effective special education specialists. Journal of International Association of Special Education, 11(1), 40–47.

10.

Friend

Reising

Cook

(1993). Co-teaching: An overview of the past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 37(4), 6–10.

11.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 34–44.

12.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Kazdan

(1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20(5), 309–318.

13.

Harvey

(n.d.). The Hunger Games characters. https://www.storyboardthat.com/lesson-plans/the-hunger-games-by-suzanne-collins/characters

14.

Hehir

Grindal

Freeman

Lamoreau

Borquaye

Burke

(2016). A summary of the evidence on inclusive education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596134.pdf

15.

Hudson

M. E.

Browder

Wakeman

(2013). Helping students with moderate and severe intellectual disability access grade-level text. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(3), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500302

16.

Hymel

Katz

(2019). Designing classrooms for diversity: Fostering social inclusion. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1652098

17.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2004).

18.

IRIS Center. (2009). Universal Design for Learning: Creating a learning environment that challenges and engages all students. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/udl/

19.

Kennette

L. N.

Wilson

N. A.

(2019). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): What is it and how do I implement it? Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 12(1), 1–6.

20.

Kleinert

Towles-Reeves

Quenemoen

Thurlow

Fluegge

Weseman

Kerbel

(2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81, 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697

21.

Kuntz

E. M.

Carter

E. W.

(2019). Review of interventions supporting secondary students with intellectual disability in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 44(2), 103–121.

22.

Lemons

C. J.

Allor

J. H.

Otaiba

S. A.

LeJeune

L. M.

(2016). 10 research-based tips for enhancing literacy instruction for students with intellectual disability. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916662202

23.

Lowrey

K. A.

Hollingshead

Howery

Bishop

J. B.

(2017). More than one way: Stories of UDL and inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(4), 225–242. http://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917711668

24.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

25.

M. W.

Rao

(2019). Digital tools for the inclusive classroom: Google Chrome as assistive and instructional technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419841546

26.

Olson

Leko

M. M.

Roberts

C. A.

(2016). Providing students with severe disabilities access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 41(3), 134–157.

27.

Paul

. Sherlock Center on Disabilities. (n.d.). Adapted version of The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. http://www.ric.edu/sherlockcenter/dsi/hungergames.pdf

28.

Rao

Smith

S. J.

Lowrey

K. A.

(2017). UDL and intellectual disability: What do we know and where do we go? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.37

29.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2017). Making inclusion work with co-teaching. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(4), 284–293.

30.

Shelton

Wexler

Silverman

R. D.

Stapleton

L. M.

(2019). A synthesis of reading comprehension interventions for persons with mild intellectual disability. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 612–651. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319857041

31.

Spencer

S. A.

(2011). Universal Design for Learning: Assistance for teachers in today’s inclusive classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 10–22.

32.

Trostle Brand

Favazza

A. E.

Dalton

E. M

. (2012). Universal Design for Learning: A blueprint for success for all learners. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2012.707506

33.

U. S. Department of Education. (2016). 37th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2015/index.html

34.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2016). Beyond access: Ensuring progress in the general education curriculum for students with severe disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31(4), 322–326.

35.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Lee

S. H.

Shogren

K. A.

(2016). Educating children with intellectual disability. In Carr

Linehan

O’Reilly

Noonan Walsh

McEvoy

(Eds.), The handbook of intellectual disability and clinical psychology practice (pp. 517–553). Routledge.

36.

Woods

Leahy

(2019). Using digital technologies to support inclusion in the mainstream classroom. REACH Journal of Special Needs Education in Ireland, 32(2), 102–124.

37.

(2010). Universal Design for Learning: A collaborative framework for designing inclusive curriculum. i.e.: Inquiry in Education, 1(2), 1–13.