FennellF.KobettB. M.WrayJ. A. (2017). The formative 5: Everyday assessment techniques for every math classroom. Corwin Press.
2.
FurtakE. M.GlasserH. M.WolfeZ. M. (2016). The feedback loop: Using formative assessment data for science teaching and learning. National Science Teachers Association Press. https://static.nsta.org/pdfs/samples/PB405Xweb.pdf
3.
HughesC. A.MorrisJ. R.TherrienW. J.BensonS. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 140–148. http://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142
4.
KaldenbergE. R.WattS. J.TherrienW. J. (2015). Reading instruction in science for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(3), 160–173. http://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714550204
5.
LeeJ.BryantD. P.OkM. W.ShinM. (2020). A systematic review of interventions for algebraic concepts and skills of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(2), 89–99. http://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12217
6.
ScammaccaN. K.RobertsG.VaughnS.StuebingK. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504995
7.
ScheuermannA. M.HarrisM. L.Faggella-LubyM. N.FritschmannN. S.GranerP. G.DeshlerD. D. (2009). Closing the performance gap: Learning strategies instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities. In SideridisG.CitroT. (Eds.) Classroom strategies for struggling learners (pp. 49–78). Learning Disabilities Worldwide.