BrowderD.SpoonerF.MeierI. (2011). Introduction. In BrowderD.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (pp. 3–22). Guilford Press.
2.
BrowderD.WakemanS.FlowersC.RickelmannR. J.PugaleeD.KarvonenM. (2007). Creating access to the general education curriculum with links to grade-level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities: An explication of the concept. Journal of Special Education, 41, 2–16. doi:10.1177/00224669070410010101
3.
BrowderD.WakemanS.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408. doi:10.1177/001440290607200401
4.
BrownF.SnellM. E. (2011). Measuring student behavior and learning. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed., pp. 186–223). Pearson.
5.
Causton-TheoharisJ. (2009). The paraprofessional’s handbook for effective support in inclusive classrooms. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
6.
ColeC.MurphyH.FrisbyM.GrossiT.BolteH. (2019). A longitudinal study to determine the impact of inclusion on student academic outcomes. Center on Education and Lifelong Learning, Indiana University.
7.
CollinsB. C.EvansA.Creech-GallowayC.KarlJ.MillerA. (2007). Comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content sight words in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220–233. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040401
8.
DessemontetR. S.BlessG.MorinD. (2012). Effects of inclusion on the academic achievement and adaptive behaviour of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 579–587. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01497.x.
9.
EtscheidtS. (2006). Progress monitoring: Legal issues and recommendations for IEP teams. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(3), 56–60. doi:10.1177/004005990603800308
10.
FildermanM. J.TosteJ. R. (2018). Decisions, decisions, decisions: Using data to make instructional decisions for struggling readers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50, 130–140. doi:10.1177/0040059917740701
11.
GiangrecoM.CloningerC. J.IversonV. S. (2011). Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children (3rd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
HuntP.McDonnellJ.CrockettM. A. (2012). Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 37, 139–152. doi:10.2511/027494812804153471
JimenezB. A.KameiA. (2015). Embedded instruction: An evaluation of evidence to inform inclusive practice. Inclusion, 3, 132–144. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-3.3.132
16.
KurthJ. A. (2013). A unit based approach to adaptations in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 34–43. doi:10.1177/004005991304600204
17.
KurthJ. A.MastergeorgeA. M. (2012). Impact of setting and instructional context for adolescents with autism. Journal of Special Education, 46, 36–48. doi:10.1177/0022466910366480
KurthJ. A.ZagonaA. L.MillerA. L.WehmeyerM. (2018). Viewpoints on interventions for students with extensive and pervasive support needs. In BakkenJ. P.ObiakorF. E. (Eds.), Advances in special education: Viewpoints on interventions for learners with disabilities (Vol. 33, pp. 143–168). Emerald Group Publishing.
20.
McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.RisenT. (2002). The effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 37, 363–377. doi:10.1177/10983007040060040301
21.
McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.RiesenT.JamesonJ. M.KercherK. (2006). Comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in general education classes with small group instruction in special education classes. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 125–138.
22.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.LewisT.MaheadyL.RodriguezJ.ScheelerM. C.WinnJ.ZieglerD. (2017, January). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
23.
MungerG. F.SnellM. E.LloydB. H. (1989). A study of the effects of frequency of probe data collection and graph characteristics on teachers’ visual analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 109–127. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(89)90001-2
24.
ReaP. J.McLaughlinV. L.Walther-ThomasC. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 68, 203–222. doi:10.1177/001440290206800204
25.
RojewskiJ. W.LeeI. H.GreggN. (2015). Causal effects of inclusion on postsecondary education outcomes of individuals with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 210–219. doi:10.1177/1044207313505648
26.
RyndakD.MorrisonA.SommersteinL. (1999). Literacy before and after inclusion in general education settings: A case study. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 24, 5–22. doi:10.2511/rpsd.24.1.5
27.
ShapiroE. S.EdwardsL.ZigmondN. (2005). Progress monitoring of mathematics among students with learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 15–32. doi:10.1177/073724770503000203
28.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. (2018). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 150–165. doi:10.1177/0741932517751055
29.
TestD. W.SpoonerF.HolzbergD.RobertsonC.DavisL. L.WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A. (2016). Planning for other educational needs and community-based instruction. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 130–150). Routledge.
30.
TrelaK.JimenezB. A. (2013). From different to differentiated: Using “ecological framework” to support personally relevant access to general curriculum for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38, 117–119. doi:10.2511/02749481380771453
31.
UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education.
32.
WaitollerF. R.KozleskiE. B. (2013). Working in boundary practices: Identity development and learning in partnerships for inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.006