AsmusJ. M.CarterE. W.MossC. K.BiggsE. E.BoltD. M.BornT. L.Bottema-BeutelK.BrockM. E.CatteyG. N.CooneyM.FespermanE. S.HochmanJ. M.HuberH. B.LequiaJ. L.LyonsG. L.VincentL. B.WeirK. (2017). Efficacy and social validity of peer network interventions for high school students with severe disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.2.118
2.
BurkeK. M.ShogrenK. A.AntoshA. A.RaleyS. K.LaPlanteT.WehmeyerM. L. (2019). Implementing evidence-based practices to promote self-determination: Lessons learned from a state-wide implementation of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(1), 18–29.
3.
CarterE. W. (2017). The promise and practice of peer support arrangements for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 52, 141–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irrdd.2017.04.001
4.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
5.
CollinsB. C.TerrellM.TestD. W. (2017). Using a simultaneous prompting procedure to embed core content when teaching a potential employment skill. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143416680347
6.
ConleyD. T. (2012). A complete definition of college and career readiness. Washington, DC: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
7.
FinnertyM. S.JacksonL. B.OstergrenR. (2019). Adaptations in general education classrooms for students with severe disabilities: Access, progress assessment, and sustained use. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(2), 87–102. doi:10.1177/1540796919846424
8.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C. (2015). Precarious or purposeful? Proactively building inclusive special education service delivery on solid ground. Inclusion, 3(3), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-3.3.112
9.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.HurleyS. M. (2013). Revisiting personnel utilization in inclusion-oriented schools. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911419015
10.
HeinrichS.CollinsB. C.KnightV.SpriggsA. D. (2016). Embedded simultaneous prompting procedure to teach STEM content to high school students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive setting. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 41–54.
11.
HuberH. B.CarterE. W.LopanoS. E.StankiewiczK. C. (2018). Using structural analysis to inform peer support arrangements for high school students with severe disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123, 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.2.119
12.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.WoodL. A. (2013). Review of experimental research on academic learning by students with moderate and severe intellectual disability in general education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813807046926
13.
JimenezB. A.KameiA. (2015). Embedded instruction: An evaluation of evidence to inform inclusive practice. Inclusion, 3(3), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-3.3.132
14.
KarlJ.CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.AultM. J. (2013). Teaching core content embedded in a functional activity to students with moderate intellectual disability using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(3), 363–378.
15.
KearnsJ.KleinertH.HarrisonB.Sheppard-JonesK.HallM.JonesM. (2011). What does “college and career ready” mean for students with significant cognitive disabilities. National Alternate Assessment Center.
16.
KuntzE. M.CarterE. W. (2019). Review of interventions supporting secondary students with intellectual disability in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919847483
17.
KurthJ. A.KeeganL. (2014). Development and use of curricular adaptations for students receiving special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 48(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912464782
18.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782
19.
LombardiA. R.KowittJ. S.StaplesF. E. (2015). Correlates of critical thinking and college and career readiness for students with and without disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414534888
20.
MatzenK.RyndakD.NakaoT. (2010). Middle school teams increasing access to general education for students with significant disabilities: Issues encountered and activities observed across contexts. Remedial and Special Education, 31(4), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327457
21.
MorningstarM. E.BassettD. S.Kochhar-BryantC.CashmanJ.WehmeyerM. L. (2012). Aligning transition services with secondary education reform: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143412454915
22.
MorningstarM. E.LombardiA.FowlerC. H.TestD. W. (2017). A college and career readiness framework for secondary students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415589926
23.
MurawskiW. W. (2009). Collaborative teaching in secondary schools: Making the co-teaching marriage work!Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24.
MurawskiW.M.HughesC.E. (2009). Response to intervention, collaboration, and co-teaching: A logical combination for successful systemic change. Preventing School Failure, 53(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.53.4.267-277
25.
OlsonA.LekoM. M.RobertsC. (2016). Providing students with severe disabilities access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(3), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916651975
26.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.McDonaldA. (2018). Whole-class implementation of the self-determined learning model of instruction in inclusive high school mathematics classes. Inclusion, 6(3), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-6.3.164
27.
RobertsC. A.LekoM. M. (2013). Integrating functional and academic goals into literacy instruction for adolescents with significant cognitive disabilities through shared story reading. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800303
28.
RoseD. H.GravelJ. W. (2010). Getting from here to there: UDL, global positioning systems, and lessons for improving education. National Center on Universal Design for Learning.
29.
RupparA. L.AfacanK.PickettK. J. (2017). Embedded shared reading to increase literacy in an inclusive language arts class: Preliminary efficacy and ecological validity. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 51–63.
30.
SaloviitaT. (2015). Measuring pre-service teachers attitudes towards inclusive education: Psychometric properties of the TAIS scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.003
31.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2016). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment in predicting outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515585003
32.
ThompsonJ. R.WalkerV. L.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). Expanding inclusive educational opportunities for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities through personalized supports. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 396–411.
33.
WehmeyerM. L.NotaL.SoresiS.ShogrenK. A.MorningstarM. E.FerrariL.SgaramellaT. M.DiMaggioI. (2019). A crisis in career development: Life designing and implications for transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417750092
34.
ZhaoY. (2018). Reach for greatness: Personalizable education for all children. Corwin Press.