BilbroJ.IluzadaC.ClarkD. E. (2013). Responding effectively to composition students: Comparing student perceptions of written and audio feedback. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 24(1), 47–83.
2.
CasasA. M.FerrerM. S.ForteaI. B. (2013). Written composition performance of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000828
GageN. A.WilsonJ.MacSuga-GageA. S. (2014). Writing performance of students with emotional and/or behavioral disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.3
5.
GrahamS.CollinsA.Rigby-WillsH. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916664070
6.
GrahamS.FishmanE. J.ReidR.HebertM. (2016). Writing characteristics of students with attention deficit hyperactive disorder: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12099
7.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1989). A component analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students’ compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.353
8.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2000) The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development, Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_2
9.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.MacArthurC.SchwartzS. (1991). Writing and writing instruction with students with learning disabilities: A review of a program of research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510517
10.
GrahamS.HebertM.HarrisK. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
11.
GrahamS.McKeownD.KiuharaS. A.HarrisK. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
12.
HaithA.KrakauerJ. (2018). The multiple effects of practice: Skill, habit and reduced cognitive load. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 20, 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.015
13.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.MasonL.FriedlanderB. (2007). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Brooks.
14.
KindzierskiC. M. (2009). “I like it the way it is!”: Peer-revision writing strategies for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.54.1.51-59
15.
LittleM.LaneK.HarrisK.GrahamS.StoryM.SandmelK. (2010). Self-regulated strategies development for persuasive writing in tandem with schoolwide positive behavioral support: Effects for second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. Behavioral Disorders, 35(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003500206
16.
MacArthurC.GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2004). Insights from instructional research on revision with struggling writers. In AllalL.ChanquoyL.LargyP. (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 125–137). Kluwer Academic.
17.
MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.SchwartzS. (1991). Knowledge of revision and revising behavior among learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510373
18.
MatsumaraL. C.Patthey-ChavezG. G.ValdésR.GranierH. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students’ revision in lower-and higher-achieving urban schools. Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/499713
19.
MatsumaraL. C.ValdésR.Patthey-ChavezG. G. (2000). Learning to write in urban elementary and middle schools: An investigation of teachers’ written feedback on student compositions. University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
20.
McKeownD.FitzPatrickE.EnnisR.PotterA.Writing is revising: Improving student writing through individualized asynchronous audio feedback. Education and Treatment of Children. Pre-published February 21, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00006-2
21.
McKeownD.FitzPatrickE.SandmelK. (2014). SRSD in practice: Creating a professional development experience for teachers to meet the writing needs of students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 40(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.1.15
22.
McKeownD.KimballK.LedfordJ. (2015). Effects of asynchronous audio feedback on the story revision practices of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(4), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0020
StemperJ. (2002). Enhancing student revising and editing skills through writing conferences and peer editing (Master’s thesis). Saint Xavier University, Chicago.