ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Effective and efficient teaching. New York City, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
BoardmanA. G.KlingnerJ. K.BuckleyP.AnnammaS.LasserC. J. (2015). The efficacy of collaborative strategic reading in middle school science and social studies classes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 1257–1283. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9570-3
3.
BoonR. T.PaalM.HintzA.-M.Cornelius-FreyreM. (2015). A review of story mapping instruction for secondary students with LD. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13, 117–140.
4.
CoiroJ. (2011). Talking about reading as thinking: Modeling the hidden complexities of online reading comprehension. Theory Into Practice, 50, 107–115. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.558435
5.
DentonC. A.EnosM.YorkM. J.FrancisD. J.BarnesM. A.KuleszP. A.. . . CarterS. (2015). Text-processing differences in adolescent adequate and poor comprehenders reading accessible and challenging narrative and informational text. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 393–416. doi:10.1002/rrq.105
6.
DukeN. K.Purcell-GatesV.HallL. A.TowerC. (2006). Authentic literacy activities for developing comprehension and writing. Reading Teacher, 60, 344–355. doi:10.1598/rt.60.4.4
7.
FisherD.FreyN. (2014). Close reading as an intervention for struggling middle school readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57, 367–376. doi:10.1002/jaal.266
8.
FisherD.FreyN.LappD. (2011). Coaching middle-level teachers to think aloud improves comprehension instruction and student reading achievement. The Teacher Educator, 46, 231–243. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2011.580043
9.
GajriaM.JitendraA. K.SoodS.SacksG. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210–225. doi:10.1177/00222194070400030301
10.
HebertM.BohatyJ. J.NelsonJ. R.BrownJ. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 609–629. doi:10.1037/edu0000082
11.
HockM. F.Brasseur-HockI. F.HockA. J.DuvelB. (2017). The effects of a comprehensive reading program on reading outcomes for middle school students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 195–212. doi:10.1177/0022219415618495
12.
HughesC. A.MorrisJ. R.TherrienW. J.BensonS. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 140–148. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12142
13.
JonesC. D.ClarkS. K.ReutzelD. R. (2016). Teaching text structure: Examining the affordances of children’s informational texts. The Elementary School Journal, 117, 143–169. doi:10.1086/687812
14.
JosephL. M.EveleighE. L. (2011). A review of the effects of self-monitoring on reading performance of students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 45, 43–53. doi:10.1177/0022466909349145
15.
LekoM. M.MundyC. A.KangH.-J.DatarS. D. (2013). If the book fits: Selecting appropriate texts for adolescents with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48, 267–275. doi:10.1177/1053451212472232
16.
LovettM. W.BordenS. L.Warren-ChaplinP. M.LacerenzaL.DeLucaT.GiovinazzoR. (1996). Text comprehension training for disabled readers: An evaluation of reciprocal teaching and text analysis training programs. Brain and Language, 54, 447–480. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0085
17.
LupoS. M.TortorelliL.InvernizziM.RyooJ. H.StrongJ. Z. (2019). An exploration of text difficulty and knowledge support on adolescents’ comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/rrq.247
18.
MeyerB.RayJ. F. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 127–152.
19.
MeyerB. J. F. (2003). Text coherence and readability. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 204–224. doi:10.1097/00011363-200307000-00007
20.
MeyerB. J. F.PoonL. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 141–159. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.141.
21.
MeyerB. J. F.WijekumarK.LeiP. (2018). Comparative signaling generated for expository texts by 4th–8th graders: Variations by text structure strategy instruction, comprehension skill, and signal word. Reading and Writing, 31, 1937–1968. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9871-4
22.
MeyerB. J. F.WijekumarK.MiddlemissW.HigleyK.LeiP.-W.MeierC.SpielvogelJ. (2010). Web-based tutoring of the structure strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth- and seventh-grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 62–92. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.1.4
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). English language arts standards—Reading: Informational text—Grades 9–10. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RI/9-10/
O’ConnorR. E.BeachK. D.SanchezV.BocianK. M.RobertsS.ChanO. (2017). Building better bridges: Teaching adolescents who are poor readers in eighth grade to comprehend history text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 174–186. doi:10.1177/0731948717698537
27.
PearsonP. D.HiebertE. H. (2013). The state of the field: Qualitative analyses of text complexity (Reading Research Report 13.01). Santa Cruz, CA: TextProject.
28.
PyleN.VasquezA. C.Lignugaris/KraftB.GillamS. L.ReutzelD. R.OlszewskiA.PyleD. (2017). Effects of expository text structure interventions on comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 469–501. doi:10.1002/rrq.179
29.
ReedD. K.PetscherY.TruckenmillerA. J. (2017). The contribution of general reading ability to science achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 253–266. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9619-3
30.
ReedD. K.Kershaw-HerreraS. (2016). An examination of text complexity as characterized by readability and cohesion. Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 75-97. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2014.963214
31.
RiccominiP. J.MoranoS.HughesC. A. (2017). Big ideas in special education: Specially designed instruction, high-leverage practices, explicit instruction, and intensive instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50, 20–27. doi:10.1177/0040059917724412
32.
RoehlingJ. V.HebertM.NelsonJ. R.BohatyJ. J. (2017). Text structure strategies for improving expository reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 71, 71–82. doi:10.1002/trtr.1590
33.
StevensE. A.ParkS.VaughnS. (2018). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in Grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 131–140. doi:10.1177/0741932517749940
34.
SwansonE.WexlerJ. (2017). Selecting appropriate text for adolescents with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 160–167. doi:10.1177/0040059916670630
35.
WijekumarK.MeyerB. J. F.LeiP. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 741–760. doi:10.1037/edu0000168
36.
WilliamsJ. P.KaoJ. C.PaoL. S.OrdynansJ. G.AtkinsJ. G.ChengR.DeBonisD. (2016). Close analysis of texts with structure (CATS): An intervention to teach reading comprehension to at-risk second graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 1061–1077. doi:10.1037/edu0000117
37.
WilliamsJ. P.PaoL. S. (2011). Teaching narrative and expository text structure to improve comprehension. In O’ConnorR. E.VadasyP. F. (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 254–278). New York, NY: Guilford Press.