Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (2017).
2.
Arlington Central School District v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006).
3.
Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
4.
Burlington School Committee v. Department of Education, 471 U.S. 359 (1985).
5.
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F., 526 U.S. 66 (1999).
6.
Endrew, F. v. Douglas County School District RE-1, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017)
7.
Florence County School District v. Carter, 510 U.S. 7 (1993).
8.
Forest Grove School District v. T.A., 557 U.S. 230 (2009).
9.
Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools, 137 S. Ct. 743 (2017).
10.
Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305 (1988).
11.
HowardP. (2004). The least restrictive environment: How to tell?Journal of Law and Education, 33, 167–180.
12.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2017).
13.
IDEA regulations, 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.1 et seq. (2018).
14.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 468 U.S. 883 (1984).
15.
L.H. v. Hamilton County Department of Education, 900 F.3d 779 (6th Cir. 2018).
16.
Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49 (2005).
17.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (2017).
18.
Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397 (1979).
19.
Winkelman v. Parma City School District, 550 U.S. 516 (2007).
20.
ZirkelP. A. (2005). A primer of special education law. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38: 62–63.
21.
ZirkelP. A. (2017a). An adjudicative checklist of the four criteria for FAPE under the IDEA. West’s Education Law Reporter, 346, 18–20.
22.
ZirkelP. A. (2017b). Failure to implement the IEP: The third dimension of FAPE under the IDEA. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28, 174–179. doi:10.1177/1044207317732582
23.
ZirkelP. A. (2017c). The two competing approaches for calculating compensatory education under the IDEA: An update. West’s Education Law Reporter, 339, 10–22.
24.
ZirkelP. A. (2018a). An adjudicative checklist for child find and eligibility under the IDEA. West’s Education Law Reporter, 357, 30–31.
25.
ZirkelP. A. (2018b). An adjudicative checklist of the criteria for the two primary remedies under the IDEA. West’s Education Law Reporter, 354, 637–640.
26.
ZirkelP. A. (2018c). Do courts require a heightened, intent standard for students’ Section 504 and ADA claims against school districts?Journal of Law & Education, 47, 109–118.
27.
ZirkelP. A. (2019). The statute of limitations for an impartial hearing under the IDEA: A guiding checklist. West’s Education Law Reporter, 363, 483–488.
