Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/. doi:10.17226/18290
2.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.
3.
ArcherA.HughesC. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1987). The psychology of written composition. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
CervettiG.BarberJ.DorphR.PearsonP. D.GoldschmidtP. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 631–658. doi:10.1002/tea.21015
6.
ChuyM.ScardamaliaM.BereiterC.PrinsenF.ResendesM.MessinaR.. . . ChowA. (2010). Understanding the nature of science and scientific progress: A theory-building approach. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36, 1–21. doi:10.21432/T2GP4R
7.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.CookL.LandrumT. J. (2008). Evidence-based practices in special education: Some practical considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 69–75. doi:10.1177/1053451208321452
8.
DrewS. V.OlinghouseN. G.Faggella-LubyM.WelshM. E. (2017). Framework for disciplinary writing in science Grades 6–12: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 935–955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000186
9.
DrewS.ThomasJ. (2018). Secondary science teachers’ implementation of CCSS and NGSS literacy practices: A survey study. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31, 267–291. doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9784-7
10.
Faggella-LubyM.GranerP. S.DeshlerD.DrewS. V. (2012). Building a house on sand: Why disciplinary literacy is not sufficient to replace general strategies for adolescent learners who struggle. Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 69–84. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318245618e
11.
GrahamS. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In MacArthurC.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
GrahamS.CollinsA. A.Rigby-WillsH. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83, 199–218. doi:10.1177/0014402916664070
13.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
14.
KiuharaS.GrahamS.HawkenL. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160. doi:10.1037/a0013097
15.
KleinP.KirkpatrickL. (2010). A framework for content area writing: Mediators and moderators. Journal of Writing Research, 2, 1–46. doi:10.17239/jowr-2010.02.01.1
16.
KrajcikJ.SutherlandL. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328, 456–459. doi:10.1126/science.1182593
17.
McNeillK. L.KrajcikJ. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain specific and domain general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 416–460. doi:10.1080/10508400903013488
18.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012-470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
19.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The condition of education: Children and youth with disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences.
20.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). The Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
22.
PearsonP. D.MojeE.GreenleafC. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in service of the other. Science, 328, 459–463. doi:10.1126/science.1182595
SolisM.VaughnS.SwansonE.McCulleyL. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 498–510. doi:10.1002/pits.21606
25.
ThomasJ. (2011). Getting students to become successful independent investigators. In Wheeler-ToppenJ. (Ed.), Science the “write” way (pp. 91–99). Alexandria, VA: NSTA Press.
26.
ThomasJ.DrewS. (2019). Practice-based professional development on writing-to-learn in middle school earth and space science: A design research study. Manuscript in preparation.
27.
TroiaG. (2006). Writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 324–336). New York: Guilford Press.
28.
TroiaG. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction (Document No. IC-5). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center web site: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configuration