AlevenV. A. W. M. M.KroedingerK. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explain with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00061-7
2.
AtkinsonR. K.RenklA.MerrillM. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solve problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 774–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.774
3.
BoothJ. L.CooperL. A.DonovanS.HuygheA.KoedingerK. R.Pare-BlagoevE. J. (2015). Design-based research within constraints of practice: Algebra by example. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20, 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.986674
4.
CarrollW. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.86.3.360
5.
CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. F.Ewing-CobbsL.BarnesM. A.FuchsL. S. (2007). Cognitive arithmetic difference in learning difficulty groups and the role of behavior inattention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00228.x
6.
ClarkR. C.NguyenF.SwellerJ. (2011). Efficiency in learning to manage cognitive load. New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
ClarkeB.DoablerC. T.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K.FienH.CaryM. S. (2016). Examining the efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538514
HughesC.A.RiccominiP. J.MorrisJ. R. (2019). Use explicit instruction. In McLeskeyJ.MaheadyL.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.LewisT. (Eds.), High leverage practices for inclusive classrooms. New York: Routledge.
10.
KalyugaS.ChandlerP.SwellerJ. (2001). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410124681
11.
KalyugaS.ChandlerP.TuovinenJ.SwellerJ. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.3.579
12.
KorteringL. J.de BettencourtL. U.BrazielP. (2005). Improving performance in high school algebra: What students with learning disabilities are saying. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593658
13.
LinewandS.BrahierD. J.HuinkerD.BerryR. Q.IIIDillonF. L.LarsonM. R.. . . SmithM. S. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
14.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM-D.BillingslyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.. . . ZieglerD. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children and CEEDAR Center.
15.
MevarechZ. R.KramarskiB. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903322591181
16.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2011). Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411414010
17.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Data-based individualization: A framework for intensive intervention. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education.
18.
PashlerH.BainP.BottgeB.GraesserA.KoedingerK.McDanielM.MetcalfeJ. (2007) Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER 2007-2004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ncer.ed.gov
19.
SchwonkeR.RenklA.SaldenR.AlevenV. (2011). Effects of different ratios of worked solution steps and problem solving opportunities on cognitive load and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.037
20.
SieglerR. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In GarnottN.ParzialeJ. (Eds.), Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511489709.002
21.
StarJ. R.CarononganP.FoegenA.FurgesonJ.KeatingB.LarsonM. R.. . . ZbiekR. M. (2015). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students (NCEE 2014-4333). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://whatworks.ed.gov
22.
SwellerJ.CooperG. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
23.
SwellerJ.MerrienboerJ. J. G. vanPaasF. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
24.
TaylorR. L.SmileyL. R.RichardsS. B. (2015). Exceptional students: Preparing teachers for the 21st century (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
25.
TraftonJ.G.ReiserB. J. (1993). The contributions of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Sciences Society (pp. 1017–1022). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.