American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2009). Definition of intellectual disability. Retrieved from http://www.aamr.org/index.cfm
2.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BashashL.OuthredL.BochnerS. (2003). Counting skills and number concepts of students with moderate intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50, 325–345. doi:10.1080/1034912032000120480
4.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.(2006). Teaching language arts, math, & science to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
5.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.HarrisA. M.WakemanS. (2008). A meta-analysis on reaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 407–432. doi:10.1177/001440290807400401
6.
ChungK. K. H.TamY. H. (2005). Effects of cognitive-based instruction on mathematical problem solving by learners with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 30(4), 207–216. doi:10.1080/13668250500349409
7.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
DesoeteA.StockP.SchepensA.BaeyensD.RoeyersH. (2009). Classification, seriation, and counting in Grades 1, 2, and 3 as two-year longitudinal predictors for low achiev- ing in numerical facility and arithmetical achievement?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 252–264. doi:10.1177/0734282908330588
9.
Dynamic Learning Maps Consortium. (2016). 2014–2015 technical manual—integrated model. Lawrence: University of Kansas, Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation.
Fuson, KarenC. (1988). Children’s counting and concept of number. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
12.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.BaileyD. H. (2013). Adolescents’ functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLOS ONE, 8(1), 1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
13.
GerbierE.ToppinoT. C. (2015). The effect of distributed practice: Neuroscience, cognition, and education. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4, 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.01.001
14.
GöranssonK.Hellblom-ThibblinT.AxdorphE. (2016). A conceptual approach to teaching mathematics to students with intellectual disability. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 182–200. doi:10.1080/00313831.2015.1017836
15.
JimenezB. A.StangerC. (2017). Math manipulatives for students with severe intellectual disabilities: A survey of special education teachers. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 36, 1–12. doi:10.14434/pders.v36i1.22172
16.
JonesC. D.ClarkS. K.ReutzelD. R. (2013). Enhancing alphabet knowledge instruction: Research implications and practical strategies for early childhood educators. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 81–89. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0534-9
17.
JordanN. C.KaplanD. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867. doi:10.1037/a0014939
18.
KleinertH. L.BrowderD. M.Towles-ReevesE. A. (2009). Models of cognition for students with significant cognitive disabilities: Implications for assessment. Review of Educational Research, 79, 301–326. doi: 10.3102/0034654308326160
19.
McCoyA.BarnettJ.CombsE. (2013). High-yield routines: Grades k-8. Reston, VA.: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
20.
MerkleyR.AnsariD. (2016). Why numerical symbols count in the development of mathematical skills: Evidence from brain and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 14–20. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha .2016.04.006
21.
MixK. S.HuttenlocherJ.LevineS. C. (2002). Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
MixK. S.SandhoferC. M.MooreJ. A.RussellC. (2012). Acquisition of the cardinal word principle: The role of input. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 274-283. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.10.003
23.
MouY.BertelettiI.HydeD. C. (2018). What counts in preschool number knowledge? A Bayes factor analytic approach toward theoretical model development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 116–133. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.016
24.
NashB.ClarkA. K.KarvonenM. (2015). First contact: A census report on the characteristics of students eligible to take alternate assessments (Technical Report No. 15–02). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation.
25.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
26.
NguyenT.WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. S.WolfeC.ElaineM. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2016 .02.003
Rittle-JohnsonB.SieglerR. S.AlibaliM. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346–362. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.2.346
30.
RohrerD.PashlerH. (2010). Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies. Journal of Management, 39(5), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311421830
31.
SchutteG. M.DuhonG. J.SolomonB. G.PoncyB. C.MooreK.StoryB. (2015). A comparative analysis of massed vs. distributed practice on basic math fact fluency growth rates. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 149–159. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.003
32.
ShumwayJ. F. (2011). Number sense routines: Building numerical literacy every day in grades K - 3. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
33.
SkiboH.MimsP.SpoonerF. (2011). Teaching number identification to students with severe disabilities using response cards. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 124–133.
34.
SoderstromN. C.BjorkR. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 176–199. doi:10.1177/1745691615569000
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Alternate achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/altguidance.pdf
Van de WalleJ. A.KarpK. S.Bay-WilliamsJ. M. (2019). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (10th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
39.
Van de WalleJ. A.LovinL. H.KarpK. S.Bay-WilliamsJ. M. (2014). Teaching student-centered mathematics: Developmentally appropriate instruction for grades pre-k–2 (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.