AlbertoP.TroutmanA. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Boston, MA: Pearson.
2.
ChafouleasS. M.VolpeR. J.GreshamF. M.CookC. (2010). School-based behavioral assessment within problem-solving models: Current status and future directions. School Psychology Review, 34, 343–349.
3.
ChazinK. T.LedfordJ. R. (2016). Preference assessments. In Evidence-based instructional practices for young children with autism and other disabilities. Retrieved from http://vkc.mc.vanderbilt.edu/ebip/preference-assessments
4.
ChowJ. C.GilmourA. F. (2015). Designing and implementing group contingencies in the classroom. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48, 137–143. doi:10.1177/0040059915618197
5.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6.
Division of Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
7.
DunlapG.StrainP. S.FoxL.CartaJ. J.ConroyM.SmithB.. . . SowellC. (2006). Prevention and intervention with young children’s challenging behavior: A summary and perspective regarding current knowledge. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 29–45. doi:10.1177/019874290603200103
8.
EnnisR. P. (2017). Group contingencies to increase appropriate behaviors in the classroom: Tips for success. Beyond Behavior, 27, 82–89. doi:10.1177/1074295617728509
9.
HornerR. H.SugaiG. (2015). School-wide PBIS: An example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 80–85.
10.
JenkinsL.FloressM.ReinkeW. (2015). Rates and types of teacher praise: A review and future directions. Psychology in the Schools, 52, 463–476. doi:10.1002/pits.21835
11.
LittleS. G.Akin-LittleA.O’NeillK. (2015). Group contingency interventions with children—1980–2010: A meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 39, 322–341. doi:10.1177/0145445514554393
12.
LitowL.PomroyD. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341–347.
13.
MagginD. M.JohnsonA. H.ChafouleasS. M.RubertoL. M.BerggrenM. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 625–654. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-341
14.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.. . . ZieglerD. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children and CEEDAR Center.
PokorskiE. A.BartonE. E.LedfordJ. R. (2017). A review of the use of group contingencies in preschool settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36, 230–241. doi:10.1177/0271121416649935
17.
PopkinJ.SkinnerC. H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32, 282–295.
SkinnerC. H.WilliamsR. L.NeddenriepC. E. (2004). Using interdependent group-oriented reinforcement to enhance academic performance in general education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 33, 384–397.
20.
SkinnerB. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York, NY: Meredith.
21.
SnellM. E.BerlinR. A.VoorheesM. D.Stanton-ChapmanT. L.HaddenS. (2012). A survey of preschool staff concerning problem behavior and its prevention in Head Start classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 98–107. doi:10.1177/1098300711416818
22.
WenX.ElickerJ. G.McMullenM. B. (2011). Early childhood teachers’ curriculum beliefs: Are they consistent with observed classroom practices?Early Education & Development, 22, 945–969. doi:10.1080/10409289.2010.507495
23.
WineB.WilderD. A. (2009). The effects of varied versus constant high-, medium-, and low-preference stimuli on performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 321–326. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-321
24.
WoleryM.LedfordJ. R. (2014). Monitoring intervention and children’s progress. In McLeanM.HemmeterM. L.SnyderP. (Eds.), Essential elements for assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (pp. 383–400). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.