AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
2.
AlexanderG. E.CrutcherM. D. (1990). Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits—Neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 13, 266–271. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-L
3.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (1982). The Doman-Delacato treatment of neurologically handicapped children. Pediatrics, 70, 810−812.
4.
American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Ophthalmology, Council on Children With Disabilities, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, & American Association of Certified Orthoptists. (2009). Learning disabilities, dyslexia, and vision. Pediatrics, 102, 837–844. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1445
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
6.
AronA. R.DurstonS.EagleD. M.LoganG. D.StinearC. M.StuphornV. (2007). Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 11860–11864. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-07.2007
7.
BarqueroL. A.DavisN.CuttingL. E. (2014). Neuroimaging of reading intervention: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 9, e83668-16. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083668
8.
BoothJ. R.WoodL.LuD.HoukJ. C.BitanT. (2007). The role of the basal ganglia and cerebellum in language processing, Brain Research, 1133, 136–144. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.074
9.
BowersJ. S. (2016). The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123, 600−612. doi:10.1037/rev0000025
10.
BurnsM. K.Petersen-BrownS.HaegeleK.RodriguezM.SchmittB.CooperM.. . .VanDerHeydenA. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of academic interventions derived from neuropsychological data. School Psychology Quarterly, 31, 28−42. doi:10.1037/spq0000117
11.
CostanzoF.MenghiniD.CaltagironeC.OliveriM.VicariS. (2013). P 61. Is high frequency rTMS a new tool in remediating dyslexia?Clinical Neurophysiology, 124, e93–e94. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.139
12.
CostanzoF.RossiS.VaruzzaC.VarvaraP.VicariS.MenghiniD. (2018). Long-lasting improvement following tDCS treatment combined with a training for reading in children and adolescents with dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.016
13.
CostanzoF.VaruzzaC.RossiS.SdoiaS.VarvaraP.OliveriM.. . . MenghiniD. (2016). Evidence for reading improvement following tDCS treatment in children and adolescents with dyslexia. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 34, 215–226. doi:10.3233/RNN-150561
14.
CrossonB.BenefieldH.CatoM. A.SadekJ. R.MooreA. B.WierengaC. E.. . . GökçayD. (2003). Left and right basal ganglia and frontal activity during language generation: Contributions to lexical, semantic, and phonological processes. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 1061–1077. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(85)90085-9
15.
DanielsP. T. (2001). Writing systems. In AronoffM.Rees-MillerJ. (Eds.), Handbook of linguistics (pp. 43–80). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16.
DeaconS. H.ConradN.PactonS. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 118–124. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118
17.
DehaeneS. (2009). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
18.
DehaeneS.CohenL. (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 254–262. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003
19.
DehaeneS.PegadoF.BragaL. W.VenturaP.Nunes FilhoG.JobertA.. . . CohenL. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330(6009), 1359–1364. doi:10.1126/science.1194140
20.
DevlinJ. T.JamisonH. L.GonnermanL. M.MatthewsP. M. (2006). The role of the posterior fusiform gyrus in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 911–922. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.911
21.
DomanR. J.SpitzE. B.ZucmanE.DelacatoC. H.DomanG. (1960). Children with severe brain injuries. Neurological organization in terms of mobility. JAMA, 174, 257–262. doi:10.1001/jama.1960.03030030037007
22.
GabrieliJ. D. E. (2016). The promise of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review, 123, 613−619. doi:10.1037/rev0000034
23.
HammillD. D.LarsenS. C. (1974). The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training. Exceptional Children, 41, 5−14. doi:10.1177/001440297404100101
24.
HancockR.GabrieliJ.HoeftF. (2016). Shared temporoparietal dysfunction in dyslexia and typical readers with discrepantly high IQ. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5, 173–177. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2016.10.001
25.
HancockR.RichlanF.HoeftF. (2017). Possible roles for fronto-striatal circuits in reading disorder. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 72, 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.025
26.
HinshelwoodJ. (1900). Congenital word-blindness. The Lancet, 155, 1506−1508. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)99645-X
27.
HoeftF.McCandlissB. D.BlackJ. M.GantmanA.ZakeraniN.HulmeC.. . . GabrieliJ. D. (2011). Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 361−366. doi:10.1073/pnas.1008950108
28.
HoeftF.MeylerA.HernandezA.JuelC.Taylor-HillH.MartindaleJ. L.. . . DeutschG. K. (2007). Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 4234−4239. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609399104
29.
HulmeC.SnowlingM. J. (2017). Reading disorders and dyslexia. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 28, 731−735. doi:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411
30.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1400 (2004).
KennedyK. M.BackmanJ. (1993). Effectiveness of the Lindamood Auditory Discrimination in Depth Program with students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 253−259.
35.
KronbichlerM.HutzlerF.WimmerH.MairA.StaffenW.LadurnerG. (2004). The visual word form area and the frequency with which words are encountered: Evidence from a parametric fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21, 946–953. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.021
LevyJ.PernetC.TreserrasS.BoulanouarK.AubryF.DémonetJ. F.CelsisP. (2009). Testing for the dual-route cascade reading model in the brain: An fMRI effective connectivity account of an efficient reading style. PloS One, 4, e6675. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006675
38.
LindamoodP.LindamoodP. (1998). The Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing Program for reading, spelling, and speech: LiPS. Teacher’s manual for the classroom and clinic (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
39.
LumJ. A.UllmanM. T.Conti-RamsdenG. (2013). Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3460–3476. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.017
40.
MabchekG. R.NelsonJ. M. (2007). How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of practicing school psychologists. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 147–157. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00239.x
41.
MalinsJ. G.GumkowskiN.BuisB.MolfeseP.RuecklJ. G.FrostS. J.. . . MenclW. E. (2016). Dough, tough, cough, rough: A “fast” fMRI localizer of component processes in reading. Neuropsychologia, 91, 394–406. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.027
42.
MartinA.SchurzM.KronbichlerM.RichlanF. (2015). Reading in the brain of children and adults: A meta-analysis of 40 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 1963–1981. doi:10.1002/hbm.22749
43.
McCandlissB. D.CohenL.DehaeneS. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–299. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7
44.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
PackardM. G.KnowltonB. J. (2002). Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 563–593. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142937
PetersonR. L.PenningtonB. F. (2015). Developmental dyslexia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 283–307. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112842
49.
PriceC. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage, 62, 816–847. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062
50.
PriceC. J.DevlinJ. T. (2003). The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 19, 473–481. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00084-3
51.
ReschlyD. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510−515. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060601
52.
RichlanF.KronbichlerM.WimmerH. (2011). Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions in dyslexic children and adults. NeuroImage, 56, 1735–1742. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.040
53.
RichlanF.KronbichlerM.WimmerH. (2013). Structural abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 3055–3065. doi:10.1002/hbm.22127
54.
ScammaccaN. K.RobertsG.VaughnS.StuebingK. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 369–390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
55.
SchlaggarB. L.McCandlissB. D. (2007). Development of neural systems for reading. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 475–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135645
56.
SeghierM. L.FaganE.PriceC. J. (2010). Functional subdivisions in the left angular gyrus where the semantic system meets and diverges from the default network. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 16809–16817. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3377-10.2010
57.
SeidenbergM. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
58.
StuebingK. K.BarthA. E.CirinoP. T.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M. (2008). A response to recent reanalyses of the National Reading Panel report: Effects of systematic phonics instruction are practically significant. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 123−134. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.123
59.
TanakaH.BlackJ. M.HulmeC.StanleyL. M.KeslerS. R.Whitfield-GabrieliS.. . . HoeftF. (2011). The brain basis of the phonological deficit in dyslexia is independent of IQ. Psychological Science, 22, 1442–1451. doi:10.1177/0956797611419521
60.
TurkeltaubP. E.BensonJ.HamiltonR. H.DattaA.BiksonM.CoslettH. B. (2012). Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency. Brain Stimulation, 5, 201–207. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.04.002
61.
TurkeltaubP. E.EdenG. F.JonesK. M.ZeffiroT. A. (2002). Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: Method and validation. NeuroImage, 16, 765–780. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1131
62.
UllmanM. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
63.
UllmanM. T.PullmanM. Y. (2015). A compensatory role for declarative memory in neurodevelopmental disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 205–222. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.008
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.MetzK.MurrayC. S.RobertsG.DanielsonL. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after Grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83, 163−195. doi:10.3102/0034654313477212
66.
YeatmanJ. D.DoughertyR. F.Ben-ShacharM.WandellB. A. (2012). Development of white matter and reading skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, e3045–e3053. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206792109