DusenburyL.ZadrazilJ.MartA.WeissbergR. (2011). State learning standards to advance social and emotional learning: The state scan of social and emotional learning standards, preschool through high school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
2.
FountasI.PinnellG. S. (2016). Benchmark assessment system (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3.
HasbrouckJ.TindalG. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636–644. doi:10.1598/RT.59.7.3
4.
HospM. K.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBMs: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
6.
JungL. A. (2007). Writing SMART objectives and strategies that fit the ROUTINE. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(4), 54–58. doi:10.1177/004005990703900406
7.
MoreC. M.HartJ. E. (2013). Maximizing the use of electronic individualized education program software. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(6), 24–29. doi:10.1177/004005991304500603
8.
MoreC. M.Hart BarnettJ. E. (2014). Developing individualized IEP goals in the age of technology: Quality challenges and solutions. Preventing School Failure, 58, 103–109.
9.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English language Arts/science and technical subjects: Grade 9–10. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RST/9-10/3/
10.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for mathematics: Grade 4. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/4/NBT/B/6/
11.
Pretti-FrontczakK.BrickerD. (2000). Enhancing the quality of individualized education plan (IEP) goals and objectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 92–105. doi:10.1177/105381510002300204
12.
SpielC. F.EvansS. W.LangbergJ. M. (2014). Evaluating the content of individualized education programs and 504 plans of young adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 452–468. doi:10.1037/spq0000101
13.
SerfassC.PetersonR. L. (2007). A guide to computer-managed IEP record systems. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 16–21. doi:10.1177/004005990704000102
14.
U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Questions and answers (Q & A) on U.S. Supreme Court Case decision Endrew F. v Douglas County School District Re-1. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
WilsonG. L.MichaelsC. A.MargolisH. (2005). Form versus function: Using technology to develop individualized education programs for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 20(2), 37–46. doi:10.1177/016264340502000204
16.
WrightP.WrightP. (2006). Wrightslaw: From emotions to advocacy (2nd ed.). Hartfield, VA: Harbor House Law Press.
