BaerD. M.WolfM. M.RisleyT. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97. doi:10.1901/jaba.1987.20-313
2.
BruhnA. L.McDanielS.FernandoJ.TroughtonL. (2017). Putting behavioral goal-setting research into practice. Beyond Behavior, 26, 66–73. doi:10.1177/1074295617711208
3.
BruhnA. L.McDanielS.RilaA.EstrapalaS. (2018). A step-by-step guide to Tier 2 behavioral progress monitoring. Beyond Behavior, 27, 15–27. doi:10.1177/1074295618756984
4.
BruhnA. L.VogelgesangK.FernandoJ.LugoW. (2016). Using data to individualize a multicomponent, technology-based self-monitoring intervention. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31, 64–76. doi:10.1177/0162643416650024
5.
CampbellA.AndersonC. M. (2011). Check-in/check-out: A systematic evaluation and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 315–326. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-315
6.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7.
CroneD. A.HawkenL.S.HornerR. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
DebnamK. J.PasE. T.BradshawC. P. (2012). Secondary and tertiary support systems in schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: A preliminary descriptive analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 142–152. doi:10.1177/1098300712436844
9.
DunnK. E.AirolaD. T.LoW. J.GarrisonM. (2012). What teachers think about what they can do with data: Development and validation of the data driven decision-making efficacy and anxiety inventory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 87–98. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.11.002
10.
FornessS. R.KimJ.WalkerH. M. (2012). Prevalence of students with EBD: Impact on general education. Beyond Behavior, 21, 3–10.
11.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MaloneA. S. (2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50, 35–43. doi:10.1177/0040059917703962
12.
GreshamF.HornerR. H.SugaiG. (2002). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 331–344. doi:10.1177/001440290106700303
13.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
14.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.57.9.705
15.
McDanielS.BruhnA. L. (2015). Using a changing-criterion design to evaluate the effects of individualized goals within check-in/check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 197–208. doi:10.1177/1098300715588263
16.
MillerL. M.DufreneB. A.SterlingH. E.OlmiD. J.BachmayerE. (2015). The effects of check-in/check-out on problem behavior and academic engagement in elementary school students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 28–38. doi: 10.1177/1098300713517141
17.
PerleJ. G. (2016). Teacher-provided positive attending to improve student behavior. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 48, 250–257. doi: 10.1177/0040059916643707
18.
PetersonL. D.YoungK. R.SalzbergC. L.HillM. (2006). Using selfmanagement procedures to improve classroom social skills in multiple general education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 1–21.
19.
RockM. L.TheadB. K. (2007). The effects of fading a strategic self-monitoring intervention on students’ academic engagement, accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 389–412. doi:10.1007/s10864-007-9049-7
20.
RodriguezB. J.LomanS. L.BorgmeierC. (2016). Tier 2 interventions in positive behavior support: A survey of school implementation. Preventing School Failure, 60, 94–105. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2015.1025354
21.
RuschF. R.KazdinA. E. (1981). Toward a methodology of withdrawal designs for the assessment or response maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 131–140. doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-131
22.
WehbyJ. H.KernL. (2014). Intensive behavior intervention: What is it, what is its evidence base, and why do we need to implement now?TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46, 38–44. doi:10.1177/0040059914523956