AlexandrinJ. R. (2003). Using continuous,
constructive, classroom evaluations. TEACHING
Exceptional Children, 36(1),
52–57.
2.
AllowayT. P. (2011). Improving working memory:
Supporting students’ learning. Thousand Oaks,
CA: SAGE.
3.
ArcherA. L. (2008, July). Active
participation: Engaging them all. Paper presented at the
annual conference of National Reading First,
Nashville, TN.
4.
BerryR. A. (2006). Teacher talk during
whole-class lessons: Engagement strategies to support the verbal
participation of students with learning disabilities.
Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,
21, 211–232. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00219.x
5.
Clunies-RossP.LittleE.KienhuisM. (2008). Self-reported and actual use
of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their
relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour.
Educational Psychology, 28,
693–710. doi:10.1080/01443410902206700
6.
CorneliusK. E. (2013). Formative assessment made
easy: Templates for collecting daily data in inclusive
classrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children,
45(5),
14–21.
7.
DehnM. J. (2008). Working memory and academic
learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken,
NJ: Wiley.
8.
DiCarloC. F.PierceS. H.BaumgartnerJ.HarrisM. E.OtaC. (2012). Whole-group instruction
practices and children’s attention: A preliminary report.
Journal of Research in Childhood Education,
26, 154–168. doi:10.1080/02568543.2012.657744
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2005). Peer assisted learning
strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension
in young children. The Journal of Special
Education, 39,
34–44.
11.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for
students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional
components. Review of Educational Research,
79, 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
12.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2003). Students with learning
disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD
studies. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp.
323–344). New York,
NY:
Guilford.
13.
GreggN.MatherN. (2002). School is fun at recess:
Informal analyses of written language for students with learning
disabilities. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 35,
7–22.
14.
GurganusS. P. (2007). Math instruction for students with
learning problems. Boston, MA:
Pearson Education.
15.
HaydonT.MacSuga-GageA. S.SimonsenB.HawkinsR. (2012). Opportunities to respond: A
key component to effective instruction. Beyond
Behavior, 22(1),
23–31.
16.
HeritageM.HeritageJ. (2013). Teacher questioning: The
epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied
Measurement in Education, 26,
176–190.
17.
HewardW. L.GardnerR.CavanaughR. A.CoursonF. H.GrossiT. A.BarbettaP. M. (1996). Everyone participates in
this class: Using response cards to increase active student
response. TEACHING Exceptional Children,
28(2),
4–10.
18.
JohnsonN.ParkerA. T. (2013). Effects of wait time when
communicating with children who have sensory and additional
disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment &
Blindness, 107,
363–374.
19.
KimW.Linan-ThompsonS.MisquittaR. (2012). Critical factors in reading
comprehension instruction for students with disabilities: A research
synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research &
Practice, 27,
66–78.
20.
MaheadyL.Michielli-PendlJ.HarperG. F.MalletteB. (2006). The effects of numbered
heads together with and without an incentive package on the science test
performance of a diverse group of sixth graders.
Journal of Behavioral Education, 15,
25–39.
21.
McIntoshR.VaughnS.SchummJ. S.HaagerD. (1994). Observations of students
with learning disabilities in general education classrooms.
Exceptional Children, 60,
249–261.
22.
McLaughlinM.AllenM. B. (2009). Teacher-directed whole-group
instruction. In Guided comprehension in Grades
3–8 (pp. 17–32).
Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
23.
MirandaR. J.HermanR. S. (2015). Teaching in real time:
Integrating continuous formative assessment into inquiry-based classroom
instruction. Science & Children,
53(1),
80–85.
24.
MontagueM.KrawecJ.EndersC.DietzS. (2013). The effects of cognitive
strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle-school students of
varying ability. Journal of Educational
Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0035176
25.
MontagueM.RinaldiC. (2001). Classroom dynamics and
children at-risk: A follow-up. Learning Disability
Quarterly, 24,
73–84.
26.
MontagueM.WargerC.MorganT. H. (2000). Solve it! Strategy
instruction to improve mathematical problem solving.
Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,
15, 110–116.
27.
RandolphJ. J. (2007). Meta-analysis of the
research on response cards: Effects on test achievement, quiz achievement,
participation, and off-task behavior. Journal of
Positive Behavior Interventions, 9,
113–128. doi:10.1177/10983007070090020201
28.
ReglinG.Akpo-SanniJ.Losike-SedimoN. (2010). The effects of a
professional development classroom management model on at-risk elementary
students’ misbehaviors. Education,
133(1),
3–18.
29.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidence-based practices in
classroom management: Considerations for research to
practice. Education & Treatment of
Children, 31,
351–380. doi:10.1353/etc.0.007
WehbyJ. H.LaneK. L. (2009). Proactive instructional
strategies for classroom management In Akin-LittleA.LittleS.BrayM.KehleT. (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral interventions in
schools (pp. 141–156).
Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11886-009
