BarrishH. H.SaundersM.WolfM. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects
of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in
a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, 2,
119–124. doi:10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119
2.
BlacherJ.HowellE.Lauderdale-LittinS.ReedF. D.LaugesonE. D. (2014) Autism spectrum disorder and
the student teacher relationship: A comparison study with peers with
intellectual disability and typical development.
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorder, 8,
324–333. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.12.008
3.
BrieschA. M.ChafouleasS. M. (2009). Review and analysis of
literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom
behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology
Quarterly, 24,
106–118. doi:10.1037/a0016159
4.
GreenbergJ.PutnamH.WalshK. (2014). Training our future teachers:
Classroom management. Washington,
DC: National Council on Teacher
Quality.
5.
GreshamF. M.GreshamG. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent,
and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive
behavior. The Journal of Special Education,
16, 101–110.
6.
KodakT.NorthupJ.KelleyM. E. (2007). An evaluation of the types
of attention that maintain problem behavior. Journal
of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40,
167–171.
7.
KampsD.WillsH. P.Heitzman-PowellL.LaylinJ.SzokeC.PetrilloT.CuleyA. (2011). Class-wide function-related
intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban
classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior
Interventions, 13,
154–176. doi:10.1177/1098300711398935
8.
LingS.HawkinsR. O.WeberD. (2011). Effects of a classwide
interdependent group contingency designed to improve the behavior of an
at-risk student. Journal of Behavioral
Education, 20,
103–116. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9125-x
9.
LittleS. G.Akin-LittleA.O’NeillK. (2014). Group contingency
interventions with children—1980–2010: A meta-analysis.
Behavior Modification, 39,
322–341. doi:10.1037/e615342013-001
10.
NorthupJ. (2000). Further evaluation of the
accuracy of reinforced surveys: A systematic replication.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33,
334–338.
11.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009).
Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive
behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system
approaches. Exceptionality,
17, 223–237. doi:10.1080/09362830903235375
12.
TheodoreL. A.BrayM. A.KehleT. J. (2004). A comparative study of group
contingencies and randomized reinforcers to reduce disruptive classroom
behavior. School Psychology Quarterly,
19, 253–271. doi:10.1521/scpq.19.3.253.40280
13.
ToddA. W.CampbellA. L.MeyerG. G.HornerR. H. (2008). The effects of a targeted
intervention to reduce problem behaviors elementary school implementation of
check in–check out. Journal of Positive Behavior
Interventions, 10,
46–55. doi:10.1177/1098300707311369
14.
WillsH. P.KampsD.HansenB.ConklinC.BellingerS.NeaderhiserJ.NsubugaB. (2009). The classwide function-based
intervention team program. Preventing School
Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth,
54, 164–171. doi:10.1080/10459880903496230
15.
WillsH. P.IwaszukW. M.KampsD.ShumateE. (2014). CW-FIT: Group contingency
effects across the day. Education and Treatment of
Children, 37,
191–210. doi:10.1353/etc.2014.0016
16.
WrightR. A.McCurdyB. L. (2012). Class-wide positive behavior
support and group contingencies: Examining a positive variation of the Good
Behavior Game. Journal of Positive Behavior
Interventions, 14,
173–180. doi:10.1177/1098300711421008