ArcherA.HughesC. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York: Guilford.
2.
BradyS. (2011). Efficacy of phonics teaching for reading outcomes: Indications from post-NRP research. In BradyS.BrazeD.FowlerC. (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 69–96). New York: Psychology Press.
3.
BurkinsJ. M.CroftM. M. (2010). Preventing misguided reading: New strategies for guided reading teachers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
CalkinsL. M. (2000). The art of teaching reading. New York: Pearson.
5.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.Kame’enuiE.TarverS. (2009). Direct instruction reading (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.
6.
CattsH. W.ComptonD. L.TomblinJ. B.BridgesM. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181. doi:10.1037/a0025323
7.
ClayM. M. (1994). Reading recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8.
CunninghamP.HallD.SigmonC. (1999). The teacher’s guide to the Four Blocks, Grades 1–3. Eugene, OR: Carson Dellosa.
9.
DaaneM. C.CampbellJ. R.GriggW. S.GoodmanM. J.OranjeA. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 Special Study of Oral Reading (NCES 2006-469). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
10.
DentonC. A.NimonK.MathesP. G.SwansonE. A.KethleyC.KurzT. B.ShihM. (2010). Effectiveness of a supplemental early reading intervention scaled up in multiple schools. Exceptional Children, 76, 394–416. doi:10.1177/001440291007600402
11.
FarrallM. L. (2012). Reading assessment: Linking language, literacy, and cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
12.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford.
13.
FoormanB.BeylerN.BorradaileK.CoyneM.DentonC. A.DiminoJ.. . . WisselS. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
14.
FountasI. C.PinnellG. S. (2009). The Fountas & Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15.
FountasI. C.PinnellG. S. (2017). The Fountas & Pinnell literacy curriculum: A tool for assessment, planning, and teaching (Expanded ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16.
GillinghamA.StillmanB. (2014). The Gillingham manual: Remedial training for children with specific disability in reading, spelling, and penmanship (8th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
17.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A.with CummingsK.Dufour-MartelC.PetersenK.Powell-SmithK.StollarS.WallinJ. (2011). DIBELS Next assessment manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group. Retrieved from https://dibels.org/
18.
GoodmanK. S. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In SingerH.RuddellR. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497–508). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
19.
HeubuschJ. D.LloydJ. W. (1998). Corrective feedback in oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 63–79. doi:10.1023/A:1022864707734
KeenanJ. M.BetjemannR. S.OlsonR. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. doi:10.1080/10888430802132279
22.
KilpatrickD. A. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
23.
LindamoodP.LindamoodP. (1998). The Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing Program for Reading, Spelling, and Speech, Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
24.
Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. (2016). Targeting the 2% Project: Instructional considerations for students with dyslexia. Austin, TX: Author.
25.
MoatsL. C. (2017). Can prevailing approaches to reading instruction accomplish the goals of RTI?Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 43, 15–22.
26.
MolS. E.BusA. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267–296. doi:10.1037/a0021890
27.
MorrisD. (2014). Diagnosis and correction of reading problems (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
29.
NelsonN. W. (2013). Syntax development in the school-age years: Implications for assessment and instruction. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 39, 9–15.
30.
NilssonN. L. (2008). A critical analysis of eight informal reading inventories. Reading Teacher, 61, 526–536. doi:10.1598/RT.61.7.2
31.
RiveraM. O.MoughamianA. C.LesauxN. K.FrancisD. J. (2008). Language and reading interventions for English language learners and English language learners with disabilities. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
32.
SimosP. G.FletcherJ. M.BergmanE.BreierJ. I.FoormanB. R.CastilloE. M.PapanicolaouA. C. (2002). Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58, 1203–1213. doi:10.1212/WNL.58.8.1203
33.
Spear-SwerlingL. (2011). Phases in reading words and phonics interventions. In O’ConnorR.VadasyP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 63–87). New York: Guilford.
34.
Spear-SwerlingL. (2015). The power of RTI and reading profiles: A blueprint for solving reading problems. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
35.
Spear-SwerlingL.BruckerP.AlfanoM. (2010). Relationships between sixth-graders’ reading comprehension and two different measures of print exposure. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 73–96. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9152-8
36.
TorgesenJ. K. (2006). Recent discoveries from research on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In SnowlingM.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521–537). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37.
TorgesenJ. K.AlexanderA.WagnerR. K.RashotteC.VoellerK.ConwayT. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58. doi:10.1177/002221940103400104
38.
WilsonB. A. (1988). Wilson reading system. Oxford, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation.