APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
BaerD. M.WolfM. M.RisleyT. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97. doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91
4.
BearG. G. (2008). Best practices in school discipline. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 431–443). Bethesda, MD: NASP.
BenazziL.HornerR. H.GoodR. H. (2006). Effects of behavior support team composition on the technical adequacy and contextual fit of behavior support plans. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 160–170. doi:10.1177/00224669060400030401
7.
BonS. C.FairclothS. C.LeTendreG. K. (2006). Protecting the rights of students with disabilities while maintaining teachers’ sense of safety in schools. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17, 148–157. doi:10.1177/10442073060170030301
8.
BossioD.LochB.SchierM.MazzoliniA. (2014). A roadmap for forming successful interdisciplinary education research collaborations: A reflective approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 198–211. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.832167
9.
BrannenM. Y.DozY. L. (2012). Corporate languages and strategic agility: Trapped in your jargon or lost in translation?California Management Review, 54, 77–97. doi:10.1525/cmr.2012.54.3.77
BronsteinL. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48, 297–308. doi:10.1093/sw/48.3.297
12.
CartledgeG.TillmanL. C.JohnsonC. T. (2001). Professional ethics within the context of student discipline and diversity. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 25–37. doi:10.1177/088840640102400105
13.
ChandlerL. K.DahlquistC. M. (2006). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
14.
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15.
EvensonA.JustingerB.PelischekE.SchulzS. (2009). Zero tolerance policies and the public schools: When suspension is no longer effective. Communiqué, 37, 5–7.
16.
IDEA regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 (2012).
17.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § § 1400 et seq. (2004 & Supp. V. 2011).
18.
JonesB. R. (2016). Parents’ perceptions of school multidisciplinary team meetings and collaboration. Educational Specialist, 106. Retrieved from http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/edspec201019/106
19.
KaiserA. P.HancockT. B.NietfeldJ. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Early Education and Development, 11, 423–446. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1104_4
20.
KatsiyannisA.LosinskiM.PrinceA. M. T. (2012). Litigation and students with disabilities: A persistent concern. NAASP Bulletin, 96, 23–43. doi:10.1177/0192636511431008
21.
KatsiyannisA.MaagJ. W. (2001). Manifestation determination as a golden fleece. Exceptional Children, 68, 85–96. doi:10.1177/001440290106800105
22.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217–226. doi:10.1177/10634266060140040501
23.
LattucaL. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
24.
LeoneP. E.MayerM. J.MalmgrenK.MeiselS. M. (2000). School violence and disruption: Rhetoric, reality, and reasonable balance. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33, 1–20.
25.
LewisT. J.MitchellB. S.HarveyK.GreenA.McKenzieJ. (2015). A comparison of functional behavioral assessment and functional analysis methodology among students with mild disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 41, 5–20. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-41.1.5
26.
OldsJ. L. (2011). For an international decade of the mind. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 18, 1–2.
SeligmanM. (2000). Conducting effective conferences with parents of children with disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
SigafoosJ.ArthurM.O’ReillyM. (2003). Challenging behavior and developmental disability. Philadelphia, PA: Whurr.
30.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380. doi:10.1353/etc.0.0007
31.
SkibaR. J. (2002). Special education and school discipline: A precarious balance. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 81–97.
32.
TaylorG. R. (2004). Parenting skills and collaborative services with students with disabilities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
WalkerJ. D. (2013). Manifestation determination reviews and school team decision-making with students with emotional/behavioral disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from JSTOR. (3592007)
36.
ZilzW. A. (2006). Manifestation determination: Rulings of the court. Education and the Law, 18, 193–206. doi:10.1080/09539960600919928