How to Review for TEACHING Exceptional Children

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Browman

H. I.

(2004). The rules of the game in science publishing. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 270, 267–268.

Cook

B. G.

Odom

S. L.

(2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science. Exceptional Children, 79, 135–144. doi:10.1177/001440291307900201

Csiszar

(2016). Peer review: Troubled from the start. Nature, 532, 306–308. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/peer-review-troubled-from-the-start-1.19763.

Lindner

M. D.

Vancea

Chen

Chacko

(2016). NIH peer review: Scored review criteria and overall impact. American Journal of Evaluation, 37, 238–249. doi:10.1177/1098214015582049

Merton

R. K.

(1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Smith

(2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 178–182. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178

Weiskittel

(2015). Evaluating traditional peer-review processes and their alternatives: An opinionated discussion. Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences, 7, 81–92.