Decisions,Decisions,Decisions: Using Data to Make Instructional Decisions for Struggling Readers

Al Otaiba S. Fuchs D . (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 414–431. doi:10.1177/00222194060390050401

Ardoin S. P. Christ T. J. Morena L. S. Cormier D. C. Klingbeil D. A. (2013). A systematic review and summarization of the recommendations and research surrounding curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.004

Christ T. J. Zopluoglu C. Long J. D. Monaghen B. D. (2012). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Quality of progress monitoring outcomes. Exceptional Children, 78, 356–373. doi:10.1177/001440291207800306

Datnow A. Hubbard L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 7–28. doi:10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2

Deno S. L. Mirkin P. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_2

Espin C. Wayman M. Deno S. McMaster K. Rooij M. (2017). Data-based decision making: Developing a method for capturing teachers’ understanding of CBM graphs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 8–21. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12123

Fuchs D. Fuchs L. S. (2015). Rethinking service delivery for students with significant learning problems: Developing and implementing intensive instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 105–111. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1184536

Fuchs D. Fuchs L. S. (2016). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A “systems” approach to instructional adaptation. Theory Into Practice, 55, 225–233. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1184536

Fuchs D. Fuchs L. S. Vaughn S. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important? TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13–18. doi:10.1177/0040059914522966

Fuchs L. S. Deno S. L. Mirkin P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460. doi:10.2307/1162454

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208. doi:10.1177/001440298605300301

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Hamlett C. L. Walz L. Germann G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 1–30.

Gallagher L. Means B. Padilla (2008). Teachers’ use of student data systems to improve instruction: 2005 to 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/teachers-data-use-2005-2007/teachers-data-use-2005-2007.pdf

Graney S. B. Martínez R. S. Missall K. N. Aricak O. T. (2010). Universal screening of reading in late elementary school: R-CBM versus CBM maze. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 368–377. doi:10.1177/0741932509338371

Hosp M. K. Hosp J. L. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading, spelling, and math: How to do it and why. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 48, 10–17. doi:10.1080/1045988x.2003.10871074

Jenkins J. Terjeson K. (2011). Monitoring reading growth: Goal setting, measurement frequency, and methods of evaluation. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 28–35. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00322.x

Jimenez B. A. Mims P. J. Browder D. M. (2012). Data-based decisions guidelines for teachers of students with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 407–413.

Lemons C. J. Kearns D. M. Davidson K. A. (2014). Data-based individualization in reading: Intensifying interventions for students with significant reading disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 20–29. doi:10.1177/0040059914522978

Mandinach E. B. Gummer E. S. (2013). A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42, 30–37. doi:10.3102/0013189x12459803

Means B. Chen E. DeBarger A. Padilla C. (2011). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/data-to-inform-instruction/report.doc

National Center for Education Statistics (2015). 2015 reading Grades 4 and 8 assessment report cards: Summary data tables for national and state average scores and achievement level results. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Data-based individualization: A framework for intensive intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

O’Connor R. Fuchs L. S. (2013). Responsiveness to intervention in the elementary grades: Implications for early childhood education. In Handbook of response to intervention (RTI) in early childhood education (pp. 41–56). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

Shinn M. Shinn M. (2008). AIMSweb benchmark and progress monitoring system for Grades K–8. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Education.

Stecker P. M. Lembke E. S. (2011). Advanced applications of CBM in reading (K–6): Instructional decision-making strategies manual. Washington, DC: National Center on Student Progress Monitoring.

Stecker P. M. Lembke E. S. Foegen A. (2008). Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52(2), 48–58. doi:10.3200/psfl.52.2.48-58

Wayman J. Cho V. Jimerson J. Spikes D. (2012). District-wide effects on data use in the classroom. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(25), 1–31. doi:10.14507/epaa.v20n25.2012