ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.StoolmillerM.KostyD. B.FienH.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K. (2016). Explicit instructional interactions exploring the black box of a Tier 2 mathematics intervention. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932516654219
3.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of1975, Pub. L. 94-142, 89 Stat. 773, codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1400.
4.
EllisE. S.WorthingtonL. A.LarkinM. J. (1994). Executive summary of research synthesis on effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators (Tech. Rep. No. 6). Eugene: University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
5.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
6.
HattieJ. A. C.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
7.
HughesC. A. (2011). Effective design and delivery of task-specific learning strategy instruction for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(2), 1–16.
8.
HughesC. A.MorrisJ. A.TherrienW. J.BensonS. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 140–148. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12142
9.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400et seq. (2006 & Supp. V. 2011)
KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KraiC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. A practice guide (NCEE No. 2008–4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc
12.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM.-D.BillingslyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.ZieglerD. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
13.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations of success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027