AhmedY.FrancisD. J.YorkM.FletcherJ. M.BarnesM.KuleszP. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in Grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 68–82. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
2.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
BerkeleyS.King-SearsM. E.HottB. L.Bradley-BlackK. (2012). Are history textbooks more “considerate” after 20 years?The Journal of Special Education, 47, 217–230. doi:10.1177/0022466912436813
4.
BrownS. H.Lignugaris-KraftB.ForbushD. E. (2016). The effects of morphemic vocabulary instruction on prefix vocabulary and sentence comprehension for middle school students with learning disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 39, 301–338. doi:10.1353/etc.2016.0014
5.
CainK.OakhillJ. V. (1999). Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503. doi:10.1023/A:1008084120205
6.
CainK.OakhillJ. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In CainK.OakhillJ. (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 41–74). New York, NY: Guilford.
7.
CarlisleJ. F.StoneC. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3
8.
CarrE. M. (1985). The vocabulary overview guide: A metacognitive strategy to improve vocabulary comprehension and retention. Journal of Reading, 28, 684–689.
CoxheadA. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238. doi:10.2307/3587951
11.
CromleyJ. G.AzevedoR. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
12.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (2003). Reading matters: How reading engagement influences cognition. In FloodJ.LappD.SquireJ. R.JensenJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 666–674). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
DeaconS. H.KirbyJ. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi:10.1017/S0142716404001110
14.
DentonC.BryanD.WexlerJ.ReedD.VaughnS. (2007). Effective instruction for middle school students with reading difficulties: The reading teacher’s sourcebook. Austin, TX: Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts.
15.
DentonC. A.WoltersC. A.YorkM. J.SwansonE.KuleszP. A.FrancisD. J. (2015). Adolescents’ use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 81–95. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016
16.
EllemanA. M.LindoE. J.MorphyP.ComptonD. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 1–44. doi:10.1080/19345740802539200
17.
FishleyK. M.KonradM.HesslerT.KeeseyS. (2012). Effects of GO FASTER on morpheme definition fluency for high school students with high-incidence disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 104–115. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00356.x
18.
GoodwinA. P. (2016). Effectiveness of word solving: Integrating morphological problem-solving within comprehension instruction for middle school students. Reading and Writing, 29, 91. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9581-0
19.
GoodwinA. P.AhnS. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208. doi:10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x
20.
HairrellA.SimmonsD.SwansonE.EdmondsM.VaughnS.RupleyW. H. (2010). Translating vocabulary research to social studies instruction: Before, during, and after text-reading strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(4), 1–7.
21.
HarmonJ. M.HedrickW. B.FoxE. A. (2000). A content analysis of vocabulary instruction in social studies textbooks for Grades 4–8. The Elementary School Journal, 253–271. doi:10.1086/499642
22.
HarmonJ. M.HedrickW. B.WoodK. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 261–280. doi:10.1080/10573560590949377
23.
HirschE. D. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge—Of words and the world. American Educator, 27, 10–13.
24.
KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KralC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices—A practice guide (NCEE Report No. 2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
25.
KrashenS. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from research (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26.
LeeC. D.SpratleyA. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
27.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L. (2004). Direct and rich vocabulary instruction. In BaumannJ. F.Kame’enuiE. J. (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (pp. 13–27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
MurawskiW. W.SwansonH. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data?Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258–267. doi:10.1177/074193250102200501
29.
ReedD. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in Grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00261.x
30.
SimmonsD.HairrellA.EdmondsM.VaughnS.LarsenR.WillsonV.. . . ByrnsG. (2010). A comparison of multiple-strategy methods: Effects on fourth-grade students’ general and content-specific reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 121–156. doi:10.1080/19345741003596890
31.
StahlS. A.NagyW. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
SwanbornM. S.De GlopperK. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261–285. doi:10.3102/00346543069003261
33.
SwansonE.WanzekJ. (2014). Applying research in reading comprehension to social studies instruction for middle and high school students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49, 142–147. doi:10.1177/1053451213496157
34.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.McCulleyL.Stillman-SpisakS.VaughnS.SimmonsD.. . . HairrellA. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 32, 199–222. doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.910718
35.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.VaughnS.FallA.-M.RobertsG.HallC.MillerV. (2016). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below average readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10573569.2015.1072068
36.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.FallA. (2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 426–442. doi:10.1177/0014402914563704
37.
SwansonE.WexlerJ. (2017). Using the common core state standards guidelines to select appropriate text for adolescents with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(3), 160–167. doi:10.1177/0040059916670630
38.
VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.SwansonE. A.BoardmanA. G.RobertsG.MohammedS. S.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.3102/0002831211410305
39.
VaughnS.RobertsG.KlingnerJ. K.SwansonE.BoardmanA.StillmanS. J.. . . LerouxA. (2013). Collaborative strategic reading: Findings from experienced implementers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6, 137–163. doi:10.1080/19345747.2012.741661
40.
VaughnS.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.WanzekJ.Stillman-SpisakS. J.SolisM.SimmonsD. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 77–93. doi:10.1002/rrq.039
41.
WanzekJ.SwansonE.VaughnS.RobertsG.FallA.-M. (2016). English learner and non-English learner students with disabilities: Content acquisition and comprehension.Exceptional Children, 82, 428–442. doi:10.1177/0014402915619419
42.
WexlerJ.MitchellM. A.ClancyE.SilvermanR. D. (2017). An investigation of literacy practices in science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 33, 258–277. doi:10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832
43.
WilkinsonI.WardropJ. L.AndersonR. C. (1988). Silent reading reconsidered: Reinterpreting reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 127–144. doi:10.3102/00028312025001127
44.
WysockiK.JenkinsJ. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66–81. doi:10.2307/747721