AllsoppD.LovinL.van IngenS. (in press). Teaching mathematics meaningfully: Solutions for reaching struggling learners (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
2.
BrennerM. E.MayerR. E.MoseleyB.BrarT.DuránR.ReedB. S.WebbD. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 663–691. doi:10.3102/00028312034004663
3.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040301
4.
ChapinS.O’ConnorC.AndersonN. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn (2nd ed.). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.
5.
CooperJ. O. H.HewardT. E.WilliamL.CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. London, England: Pearson Education.
6.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
7.
GerstenR.ChardD.JayanthiM.BakerS.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2008). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities or difficulty learning mathematics: A synthesis of the intervention research. Portsmouth, NH: Center on Instruction.
8.
HegartyM.KozhevnikovM. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684
9.
Institute of Education Sciences. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/2
10.
KramarskiB. (2008). Promoting teachers’ algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 83–99. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9020-6
11.
KrawecJ. (2012). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of students of varying math ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 1–13. doi:10.1177/0022219412436976
12.
MayerR. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
13.
MercerC. D.MillerS. P. (1991). The strategic math series. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
14.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
15.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
16.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
17.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (KilpatrickJ.SwaffordJ.FindellB., Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18.
PolyaG. (1945). How to solve it: A new mathematical model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
PowellS. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 94–108. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x
SchneiderW.ArteltC. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM, 42, 149–161. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2
22.
SchrawG. (1994). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 143–154. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1013
23.
SilverE. A. (1982). Knowledge organization and mathematical problem solving. In LesterF. K.GarofaloJ. (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 15–25). Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Press.
24.
StylianouD. A.SilverE. A. (2004). The role of visual representations in advanced mathematical problem solving: An examination of expert-novice similarities and differences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 353–387. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0604_1
25.
SzidonK.FranzoneE. (2009). Task analysis. Madison, WI: National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders.
26.
Van de WalleJ.KarpK.Bay-WilliamsJ. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
van GarderenD.MontagueM. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 246–254. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00079
28.
VerschaffelL.De CorteE.LasureS.Van VaerenberghG.BogaertsH.RatinckxE. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 195–229. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0103_2